To: Ichneumon
Nice disection of the pseudo-scientific mumbo-jumbo. But I would change the grade:
Final grade: Flush mind after reading.
38 posted on
08/03/2003 8:11:23 AM PDT by
balrog666
(Religions change; beer and wine remain.)
To: balrog666
bb ...
On his own theory, Steven Pinker (( typical evo )) is utterly inexplicable. For matter randomly playing out in a blind chain of causation cannot account either for his being or his mind. He is not allowed to be a "subjectivity," because his own theory denies there is such a thing. On his own theory, Steven Pinker is utterly inexplicable. For matter randomly playing out in a blind chain of causation cannot account either for his being or his mind. He is not allowed to be a "subjectivity," because his own theory denies there is such a thing. Indeed, it takes pains to remove such a thing from scientific relevance.
Indeed, it takes pains to remove such a thing from scientific relevance.
bb (( fC )) ...
Indeed, it takes pains (( honesty - philosophy - objectivity )) ...
to remove such a thing (( bias - ideology - religion - fantasy )) ---
from scientific relevance (( truth - reality // cause - effect - LAWS )) .
fC ...
People's choice of METHODOLY (( reason - materialsm - ATHEISM )) is really their belief system (( subjectivity - IDOLATRY )) !
Just fabricate * input * your ego delusians (( ph - rwp - ah2 )) ...
stick to your mantra - SCHLOCK - SUBJECTIVITY - ideology (( ph - rwp - ah2 )) ---
and * block out * reality - thinking - OBJECTIVITY (( ph - rwp - ah2 )) !
And " attack * conservatives --- creationists --- real science !
Evolution is glorified - sanctified subjectivity -- IDOLATRY !
Pharohism !
41 posted on
08/03/2003 9:10:37 AM PDT by
f.Christian
(evolution vs intelligent design ... science3000 ... designeduniverse.com --- * architecture * !)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson