Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Conservative84
M113 is slower. I like the new Buggies tube framed and can carry twin 50's even quads..... it can travel over 60 is 4 wheel drive.... engine in the rear it can lose a tire, not just flat but gone off the side and run fast on 3 wheels because it is balanced. It hits fast and so far the SF boys are playing with them. They can be stacked on top of each other to be loaded. they are very light.

As to the Strykers....they are deployed like Airborne. They move in fast hit hard and get out. They have waiting air support chops and fixed wings.... they have real time battle info and comm.... if they are utilized like they are supposed to instead of misused like the Airborne and Rangers in WWII, (Attrited as front line soldiers), they will be very efective. They have anti-tank weapons and can kill most tanks the enemy has. But they are made to hit and run. Overwhelming fire against infantry and too fast for arty.

I was M113 and M981 qualified. The M981 FIST, TOW could run 60 mph go up a grade of around 75% and kills tanks. Bad thing is only armed with TOWS one 60 and personal weapons. Trained OCS'ers on the Targeting System for a while at FT. SILL.... goes to 10 digit grid square, know where you are and hit target every time. M981 - 26 tons / M113 - 13 tons
80 posted on 08/06/2003 5:13:47 PM PDT by Michael121
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]


To: Michael121
Wheeled Light Armoured Vehicles — Pros and Cons
86 posted on 08/06/2003 5:59:26 PM PDT by Cannoneer No. 4 ("Fahr na HO!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson