To: Conservative84
For thread reference:
![](http://community.webshots.com/s/image2/5/80/6/50558006VebuxS_ph.jpg)
M-113
![](http://community.webshots.com/s/image5/8/83/6/64588306drFJHL_ph.jpg)
M-114
45 posted on
08/05/2003 5:32:19 AM PDT by
jriemer
(We are a Republic not a Democracy)
To: Thunder 6; jriemer; Sparta; NWU Army ROTC; kattracks; Conservative84; Cannoneer No. 4; ...
This is a good web page for M114 pictures.
http://www.jed.simonides.org/fulltrack/mike-number-us/m114_series/m114-series.html Do not discount them. They were very good for their day with the exception of the hydra-matic transmission. It lacked a torque converter, using only a fluid coupling with straight vanes. If they would have been converted to about the same standard as the M113 with a diesel and a better power train they might have had a much better reputation. I would have used the same engine the Gamma Goat had, a 3/53 (half of the 6V53 used in the M113s) coupled it to a good Chrysler automatic and you might have had something.
Oh well, "if an elephant had wings" - you know the rest.
49 posted on
08/05/2003 2:58:27 PM PDT by
SLB
To: jriemer
![](http://mailer.fsu.edu/~akirk/tanks/UnitedStates/cargo-personnel/uscpc-Ford-T16.jpg)
Bren Gun Carrier (US Ford T16 version)
To: jriemer
![](http://www.geocities.com/Pentagon/Base/1374/m551angle.gif)
M-551 Sheridan Armored Reconaissance/Airborne Assault Vehicle
We need something like this, only newer and better, now!
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson