To: kattracks
Going to be a disaster. From what I have heard, when armed with a 105, the turret cannot traverse, otherwise it tips over. I have also heard that 12.7 can make mincemeat of the armor.
To: NWU Army ROTC; kattracks; theFIRMbss; Tunehead54; mark502inf; MadJack; Paul Ross; dragon6; ...
27 posted on
08/03/2003 10:00:09 AM PDT by
Cannoneer No. 4
("A little more grape, Captain Bragg.")
To: NWU Army ROTC
Going to be a disaster. From what I have heard, when armed with a 105, the turret cannot traverse, otherwise it tips over. I have also heard that 12.7 can make mincemeat of the armor.
Plus, the 105 lacks the firepower to successfully engage a T-62 or anything better.
As many others on this thread said, the Army was better either modifying the M-113 or buying LAVs (a'la the Marines).
32 posted on
08/03/2003 9:35:11 PM PDT by
Sparta
(Send the Palestinians to their homeland, Jordan.)
To: NWU Army ROTC
Supposedly, the armor was fixed last year so it will stop a .50 cal round. Stopping an RPG takes application of additional armor from a kit.
To: NWU Army ROTC
RPGs are more of a worry. Easier to carry/conceal, more numerous, and these things are far from RPG-proof.
63 posted on
08/06/2003 4:15:41 AM PDT by
FreedomPoster
(this space intentionally blank)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson