Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: AntiGuv
It's self-evidently meant to portray the expansion of welfare and pork spending under Bush, versus the contraction of welfare and pork spending under Reagan.

Yes, of course. But is this congressional (as in controlling the purse strings) or administrative?

36 posted on 08/01/2003 6:55:26 PM PDT by Mudbug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]


To: Mudbug
But is this congressional (as in controlling the purse strings) or administrative?

I'm not sure what you're asking here.

43 posted on 08/01/2003 6:58:37 PM PDT by AntiGuv (™)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson