[Luis Gonzalez]

Better than yours is.

"Again, any candidate who can convince me that they are for small government."

So, you will cast your vote for any politico that will make you a promise that he knows he will never have to fulfill. He will make you that promise hoping that if enough people like yourself vote for him, he will be able to get millions of dollars from the Federal government to run his campaign.

The reason that you refuse to name a name is that your candidate does not exist.

[Stew Padasso]

That paper must be worth something. Or the government wouldn't jail you for not paying.

Who is convinced that the government has any *respect* for your assets and resources?

[Stew Padasso]

"The reason that you refuse to name a name is that your candidate does not exist."

And there is the rub. I would be interested to hear of any candidate within the RP who has an effective argument for small government. I'll help promote their efforts.

Can you point to anyone in leadership who is making an effective argument? i'm sure that locally there are plenty. I just don't know where.

[Stew Padasso]

"he will be able to get millions of dollars from the Federal government to run his campaign."

That candidate has already lost my vote.

[TBP]

So, you will cast your vote for any politico that will make you a promise that he knows he will never have to fulfill. He will make you that promise hoping that if enough people like yourself vote for him, he will be able to get millions of dollars from the Federal government to run his campaign.

The reason that you refuse to name a name is that your candidate does not exist.

I'll name one for you: Howard Phillips. A committed constitutionalist, small-government conservative who has never taken a cent of government money for his campaigns.

[TBP]

Good grief, you professional Republican Kool Aid drinking Bushbots are sanctimonious!