To: Brian S
Slanted. Big time.
I heard this reported at the top of the hour news during Rush and could barely believe my ears. This is how a drop in unemployment is reported when a Republican in President.
4 posted on
08/01/2003 12:43:26 PM PDT by
Skooz
(Tagline removed by moderator)
To: Skooz
To: Skooz
"Women, children and minorities hardest hit."
12 posted on
08/01/2003 12:46:26 PM PDT by
Cyber Liberty
(© 2003, Ravin' Lunatic since 4/98)
To: Skooz
Of course. See mediaresearch.org they do a masterful job of pointing this out. Early in W's term, pre 9-11, they ran a nice comparison. A certain economic statistic was reported. I don't remember what it was, but they compared 2 cases. the identical number, say 2.5%, was trending down under Clinton when reported and was treated as a positve. The identical number was trending up under Bush when reported and was treated as a negative. (And it WASN'T an instance where up was bad and down was good)
60 posted on
08/01/2003 7:28:11 PM PDT by
wny
To: Skooz
Clinton had a 7% unemployment rate
Then they cooked the books to make them look lower
He also also pumped up the GNP from '98-2000 after the bubble burst to get algore elected and to build a "legacy"
Latest true rate is about 5.1%
#s are easily played with; Clinton merely modified data reporting
76 posted on
08/04/2003 6:41:09 AM PDT by
autoresponder
(PETA TERRORISTS .wav file: BRUCE FRIEDRICH: http://tinyurl.com/hjhd)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson