[RMDupree]

I voted for Clay, but the ad hominem attacks towards Ruben in this article are disgusting! They used every unpleasant adjective they could think of. That is wrong.

[RWG]

They used every unpleasant adjective they could think of. That is wrong...the adjectives fit. The author could have used mobidly obese with every reference to the fat guy but he didn't.

[amused]

I voted for Clay, but the ad hominem attacks towards Ruben in this article are disgusting! They used every unpleasant adjective they could think of. That is wrong.

Agreed.

[honeygrl]

"I voted for Clay, but the ad hominem attacks towards Ruben in this article are disgusting! They used every unpleasant adjective they could think of. That is wrong. "

If he doesn't like it, he could always lose some weight. I hear subway has a nice diet plan for people like him.

[L.N. Smithee]

I voted for Clay, but the ad hominem attacks towards Ruben in this article are disgusting! They used every unpleasant adjective they could think of. That is wrong.

It kills me -- people pile on Hillary, Chelsea, Janet Reno and other sub-Victoria's secret model liberalettes about their looks, their weight, and whatever else (I have done so in the past, but have broken the habit), and then I get a look at some of the Freepers at protests. From a purely aesthetic viewpoint, a few of them make Hillary look like Venus de Milo. Heaven help them if they should ever become liberals -- the blowback from the "Chelsea's a dog" crowd would be gale-force.

Inner beauty is more important than looks. Beware being bitchy if you would suffer under your own standards.