To: Timesink
Jill Abramson??????????
This is so rich. What was her sidekicks name?
Wasn't Ms. Abramson involved with getting the private background info on Linda Tripp...from the Pentagon...and then leaking it to the press...from Ken the bowtie guy?????
Is my memory correct here?
![](http://0cents.com/Merchant2/graphics/00000001/Stamp_Image_New_York_Slimes.jpg)
5 posted on
07/31/2003 4:32:23 PM PDT by
Seeking the truth
(Hired Mercenary - Have Bullhorn - Will Shoutl for Freedom!)
To: Seeking the truth
The New York Times is passionately committed to promoting liberalism. As Rush said on today's program, excellence is not among their objectives.
7 posted on
07/31/2003 4:34:15 PM PDT by
goldstategop
(In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
To: Seeking the truth
8 posted on
07/31/2003 4:36:56 PM PDT by
Howlin
To: Seeking the truth
9 posted on
07/31/2003 4:38:21 PM PDT by
Howlin
To: Seeking the truth
10 posted on
07/31/2003 4:39:46 PM PDT by
Howlin
To: Seeking the truth
"Wasn't Ms. Abramson involved with getting the private background info on Linda Tripp...from the Pentagon...and then leaking it to the press...from Ken the bowtie guy?????" How do you think she earned her stripes?
25 posted on
07/31/2003 5:49:38 PM PDT by
okie01
(The Mainstream Media: IGNORANCE ON PARADE.)
To: Seeking the truth
Your memory is quite correct. Abramson is also best buds with Hillary! and her sleazy spouse. Abramson will make sure that nothing embarrassing or remotely controversial will thwart her heroine Hillary's efforts to occupy the White House again.
I suspect that Abramson was the one who made sure that Juanita Broaddrick's story was relegated to page A-16 of the NYT's and the rape angle was marginalized by focusing on "how the accusation made it to the mainstream" via the Vast Right Wing Conspiracy.
Looks like The New York Times will continue to be a LYING, LEFTIST rag with an OBVIOUS AGENDA. Thank goodness even people on the left are realizing that it is not a credible news source. (As if it ever was!) Until the Clinton's came along, I never realized how biased the NYT's really was...and still is. Zip credibility.
35 posted on
08/01/2003 8:11:12 AM PDT by
demnomo
To: Seeking the truth; hellinahandcart; alisasny; Dutchy; NYC GOP Chick; StarFan; Oschisms; Clemenza; ..
That was Julie or Judy Mayer. Your memory is correct. Slimeballs both.
Looks like that "housecleaning" at "All the news that's fit to slant" really had an effect, eh?
41 posted on
08/05/2003 4:36:33 PM PDT by
sauropod
(Spandex is a priviledge, not a right.)
To: Seeking the truth
That was Kenneth Bacon.
44 posted on
08/05/2003 4:40:03 PM PDT by
sauropod
(Spandex is a priviledge, not a right.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson