[Seeking the truth]

Jill Abramson??????????

This is so rich. What was her sidekicks name?

Wasn't Ms. Abramson involved with getting the private background info on Linda Tripp...from the Pentagon...and then leaking it to the press...from Ken the bowtie guy?????

Is my memory correct here?

[goldstategop]

The New York Times is passionately committed to promoting liberalism. As Rush said on today's program, excellence is not among their objectives.

[Howlin]

Strange Justice: The Selling of Jane Mayer and Jill Abramson

[Howlin]

http://loper.org/~george/trends/1999/Dec/73.html

[Howlin]

How the NYT Is Like the FBI Howell Raines=Robert Mueller; Jill Abramson=Coleen Rowley.

[okie01]

"Wasn't Ms. Abramson involved with getting the private background info on Linda Tripp...from the Pentagon...and then leaking it to the press...from Ken the bowtie guy?????"

How do you think she earned her stripes?

[demnomo]

Your memory is quite correct. Abramson is also best buds with Hillary! and her sleazy spouse. Abramson will make sure that nothing embarrassing or remotely controversial will thwart her heroine Hillary's efforts to occupy the White House again.

I suspect that Abramson was the one who made sure that Juanita Broaddrick's story was relegated to page A-16 of the NYT's and the rape angle was marginalized by focusing on "how the accusation made it to the mainstream" via the Vast Right Wing Conspiracy.

Looks like The New York Times will continue to be a LYING, LEFTIST rag with an OBVIOUS AGENDA. Thank goodness even people on the left are realizing that it is not a credible news source. (As if it ever was!) Until the Clinton's came along, I never realized how biased the NYT's really was...and still is. Zip credibility.

[sauropod]

That was Julie or Judy Mayer. Your memory is correct. Slimeballs both.

Looks like that "housecleaning" at "All the news that's fit to slant" really had an effect, eh?

[sauropod]

That was Kenneth Bacon.