To: ninenot
re: tax freedom day.
Consider this. In 1950, tax freedom day for the wealthiest of Americans was probably in October. They were paying a 90% marginal rate. Now, taxes are more flat, and fair.
To: CO_dreamer
That's not the point.
The point is that the cost of living is affected by regs and taxes, not to mention commodities, housing, etc.
Thus--while salaries/wages may rise, the cost of living may well rise at a greater rate---therefore, the REAL income is not the same as "salaries/wages."
Taxes and regs are even more significant when one addresses manufacturers, who are burdened by these costs in the USA--but in other countries, tax/reg burdens are somewhat less (albeit there are exceptions..)
So the numbers have significance. We're not all that concerned about the 'top 10%,' nor the 'bottom 10%' (for whom tax freedom day is January 1 if you don't count Social Security...
In this calc, the average counts most.
610 posted on
08/01/2003 11:50:52 AM PDT by
ninenot
(Torquemada: Due for Revival Soon!!!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson