To: dirtboy; Southack
Then there's the Chicago Sun-Times piece (7/19) in which the writer, a banker and industrialist, states that REAL wages are less now than they were in 1947.
...and while anybody can get a raise of 3-4%, if the COL increases by same or more, that's a REAL wage decrease.
558 posted on
08/01/2003 10:30:40 AM PDT by
ninenot
(Torquemada: Due for Revival Soon!!!)
To: ninenot
and while anybody can get a raise of 3-4%, if the COL increases by same or more, that's a REAL wage decrease. Which I subsequently demonstrated - average wages went up 1.8 percent last year, whereas inflation increased about 2.2 percent. But Southack assures me that I am wrong for saying that's a net decrease. And, considering that government average incomes went up by 4.9 percent, the average salary in the private sector went up by only .8 percent - or about 1.4 percent BELOW the rate of inflation. But according to Southack, I'm all full of it.
Someone help me to to understand Southackenomics, please. Must be that new math.
559 posted on
08/01/2003 10:33:24 AM PDT by
dirtboy
(haWho's that big cat I saw roaming around here again? I thought he went extinct...)
To: ninenot
In 1947... a high school graduate could get a factory job, and buy a house after a few years. Try that today.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson