Excerpted and condensed from:
Adam Smith: The Wealth of Nations, Book 4, Chapter 2
Of Restraints upon the Importation from Foreign Countries
of such Goods as can be produced at Home
"There seem, however, to be two cases in which it will generally be advantageous to lay some burden upon foreign for the encouragement of domestic industry...
The first is, when some particular sort of industry is necessary for the defence of the country....
The second case, in which it will generally be advantageous to lay some burden upon foreign for the encouragement of domestic industry is, when some tax is imposed at home upon the produce of the latter. In this case, it seems reasonable that an equal tax should be imposed upon the like produce of the former....
As there are two cases in which it will generally be advantageous to lay some burden upon foreign for the encouragement of domestic industry, so there are two others in which it may sometimes be a matter of deliberation; in the one, how far it is proper to continue the free importation of certain foreign goods; and in the other, how far, or in what manner, it may be proper to restore that free importation after it has been for some time interrupted....
The case in which it may sometimes be a matter of deliberation how far it is proper to continue the free importation of certain foreign goods is, when some foreign nation restrains by high duties or prohibitions the importation of some of our manufactures into their country. Revenge in this case naturally dictates retaliation, and that we should impose the like duties and prohibitions upon the importation of some or all of their manufactures into ours....
The case in which it may sometimes be a matter of deliberation, how far, or in what manner, it is proper to restore the free importation of foreign goods, after it has been for some time interrupted, is, when particular manufactures, by means of high duties or prohibitions upon all foreign goods which can come into competition with them, have been so far extended as to employ a great multitude of hands. Humanity may in this case require that the freedom of trade should be restored only by slow gradations, and with a good deal of reserve and circumspection. Were those high duties and prohibitions taken away all at once, cheaper foreign goods of the same kind might be poured so fast into the home market as to deprive all at once many thousands of our people of their ordinary employment and means of subsistence. The disorder which this would occasion might no doubt be very considerable....
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/954156/posts?page=1when some foreign nation restrains by high duties or prohibitions the importation of some of our manufactures into their country Do India/China have import restrictions? I recall this was the claim regarding Japanese markets during the auto/steel tariff debates of the 1980s.
OR, to restore the free importation of foreign goods, after it has been for some time interrupted... Were those high duties and prohibitions taken away all at once, cheaper foreign goods of the same kind might be poured so fast into the home market as to deprive all at once many thousands of our people of their ordinary employment
Here, Smith is discussing phasing in the restoration of free trade, not the enactment of tariffs to protect local labor markets in the first place. Does he discuss the use of tariffs for anything other than retaliation or restoration?
That's the crux of the issue: do we as a country impose tariffs just because technology has moved so fast to enable offshoring and the service skills are so transportable?
This would be a first. I think that would be a very big step, which is why neither the Dems or Pubs are even entertaining the issue.