[Lijahsbubbe]

star Kobe Bryant and his 19-year-old accuser had some consensual sexual contact, but the intercourse was not consensual

Oh boy, I am very conflicted on this. If this woman had oral sex with Bryant, and resisted intercourse, should that be equated with a rape where there was no sexual contact prior to the rape? Maybe they need to come up with a new name for this kind of (disclaimer:alleged) rape.

[NativeNewYorker]

If this woman had oral sex with Bryant, and resisted intercourse...

If she spit, you must acquit.

[aristeides]

If this woman had oral sex with Bryant, and resisted intercourse, should that be equated with a rape where there was no sexual contact prior to the rape?

Of course it should. The law is clear.

[Stone Mountain]

Oh boy, I am very conflicted on this. If this woman had oral sex with Bryant, and resisted intercourse, should that be equated with a rape where there was no sexual contact prior to the rape?

Big if. But even if this was the case, Bryant would be guilty of rape at the point where he did anything that she didn't consent to. It doesn't and shouldn't matter what happened before that...

[billhilly]

"Maybe they need to come up with a new name for this kind of (disclaimer:alleged) rape."

Rope? A mixture between a romp and a rape.