To: wardaddy; dwd1
Thanks for the info on this fascinating case....
100 posted on
07/31/2003 9:57:05 AM PDT by
tracer
(/b>)
To: tracer; wardaddy
Just like you, we enjoy a good discussion...
102 posted on
07/31/2003 9:59:45 AM PDT by
dwd1
(M. h. D. (Master of Hate and Discontent))
To: tracer; dwd1
Indeed and everyone has some opinion about some aspect of it.
While I am arguably torn but "leaning" towards believing that things probably got out of hand....(just a surmisal, nothing more), I have seen that in my family and extended family that the women are much much more likely to condemn him. I think the fact that he was at a minimum cheating seals his fate with the Madame DuFarges in my family...lol
...and the fact that they are angered that he did that to such a beautiful young wife NOT LONG AFTER SHE GAVE BIRTH TO THEIR CHILD.....makes it sort of personal for the ladies.
Of course they all support her standing by her man for now in the course of practical considerations.
You should have seen the thrashing I got from Mrs Wardaddy at the beginning of the Peterson tragedy when I told my wife that "The prosecution is going to need more than simply the appearance that his pregnant wife disappeared"....one of the few times we have clashed over anything like that. I of course admitted my pure idiocy and submitted to her opinion that Peterson was indeed Satan...which as the case has unfolded, it would appear that she was right. Naturally.
Women...gotta love em.
127 posted on
07/31/2003 10:39:01 AM PDT by
wardaddy
(True happiness is nuts after the flop.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson