[Freedom4US]

No, read between the lines. A similar, if opposite, situation ocurred with President Eisenhower during the cold war. His intelligence at the time indicated that the Soviets had nowhere near the missile capability that was publicly believed. Accordingly, he reduced military spending. His loyal opposition, the Democrats knew this as well - but chose to publicly brand the President as "Soft on Communism" - since the real military situation could not be publicly announced. It could be we're seeing something analagous right now - political maneuvering at the expense of overall national security.

[UCANSEE2]

political maneuvering at the expense of overall national security.

BINGO. At the expense of overall national security, the expense of the life and livelihoods of every American citizen. Any person that believes that people like KENNEDY or HILLARY CLINTON care about them as human being, instead of as a PAWN to be used or killed at the whims of the Aristocracy, needs to wake up. Evil shows itself in actions. Watch their actions.

We also must watch President Bush's actions. Just because we (I) trust him, or believe in what he has done so far, does not mean he is infallible. I can say his actions so far represent morality, responsibility, care and concern for US citizens. I can say EX-never should have been pRESIDENT Clinton's actions were those of EVIL.