[HitmanLV]

To be fair, WMD do have to be found at some point, or else the President and Tony blair will have legitimately compromised their ability to lead.

[UCANSEE2]

To be fair, WMD do have to be found at some point, or else the President and Tony blair will have legitimately compromised their ability to lead.

To be fair, let's admit the truth. Your statement is the foundation of the whole DEMOCRATIC push to embarrass and remove President Bush from office.

They are saying if BUSH doesn't come up with PROOF of WMD's RIGHT NOW, he is a liar.

The LIAR part is the Democrats stating that BUSH stated THEY HAD EM.

The statement in question, does not contain those words.

If you read the statement the President made, you will see he did not state THEY HAD EM.

If you would rather allow statements taken out of context to be truth, and then base whether you follow the liars who take statements out of context, or the person being accused of lying by liars on that basis, then I can see why you made the statement you did.

Good luck with that attitude, by the way.

[Consort]

To be fair, WMD do have to be found at some point, or else the President and Tony blair will have legitimately compromised their ability to lead.

No. Everybody knew that Iraq had them and that they were used in the past. They were hidden or destroyed or given to terrorists, in part, to embarrass Bush and Blair and maybe to not reveal any involvement by France, Germany and Russia, if any, IMO. As far as leadership is concerned, we know what Liberals do when they are in control and we must keep them out of power. It's an easy option for me, especially since the outcome was successful and because I think the long term benefits will pay off in many ways.