Skip to comments.
Satellite Shows Dramatic Aral Loss
BBC ^
| 7-30-2003
| Ivan Noble
Posted on 07/30/2003 4:31:33 PM PDT by blam
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-39 next last
1
posted on
07/30/2003 4:31:33 PM PDT
by
blam
To: blam
2
posted on
07/30/2003 4:34:05 PM PDT
by
blam
To: blam
3
posted on
07/30/2003 4:35:30 PM PDT
by
blam
To: blam
This was a disaster in the making during the USSR days. How is beautiful Lake Bakul doing BTW? Now that is absolutely mystical.
4
posted on
07/30/2003 4:38:15 PM PDT
by
OpusatFR
To: OpusatFR
I thought enviromental problems were caused by the US.
5
posted on
07/30/2003 4:39:50 PM PDT
by
snooker
To: blam
I bet the dims are trying to figure out a way to blame this on the Bush admimistration too.
To: blam
I don't understand how this could happen. I thought this sort of "rape of the environment" was caused by corporate greed. The newsman on TV said that turning land over to the custody of the state is the only way to Save The Planet.
Umm, weren't these communist countries when these irrigation projects started? |
7
posted on
07/30/2003 4:45:24 PM PDT
by
Nick Danger
(The views expressed may not actually be views)
To: OpusatFR
"How is beautiful Lake Bakul doing BTW? Now that is absolutely mystical." Doing just fine. It is the deepest lake in the world
Lake Baikal
8
posted on
07/30/2003 4:46:25 PM PDT
by
blam
To: snooker
It is the result of Soviet "Man controls the nature" policy. Screwing with waterways, diverting flows, building dams, messes up the age long balance and the result is messed up water tables and drying water bodies. They would say: Man won! - reclaiming the soil from the lake. :-
Where are the enviromentablists (as Mike Tyson would say on Rush)?
To: Leo Carpathian
Makes one wonder what impact China's build-it-or-be-damned policy on the Three Gorges Dam is going to have. I'm no environwacko, and I firmly believe God put us on this planet to be in charge and use its resources responsibly. But the key word there is "responsibly."
}:-)4
10
posted on
07/30/2003 5:08:34 PM PDT
by
Moose4
(I'm the moose, bring on the cheese baby!)
To: Joe Boucher
I bet the dims are trying to figure out a way to blame this on the Bush admimistration too. And a bunch of academics and researchers of various ilks looking for research grants are seeking a way to blame it on Global Warming.
Along with a bunch of displaced socialists who are desperately looking to any excuse to become the "Worldwide Commissariat of Energy Usage".
11
posted on
07/30/2003 7:22:29 PM PDT
by
Ole Okie
(A respectful and sad salute to Bob Hope, and "Thanks for the Memories".)
To: Nick Danger
Umm, weren't these communist countries when these irrigation projects started? There you go...being all logical again.
To: blam
The green part in the middle doesn't look particularly healthy. Is that salt or copper causing the color?
13
posted on
07/30/2003 7:26:34 PM PDT
by
RightWhale
(Destroy the dark; restore the light)
To: blam
That photo comparison is just sickening. UFB!
14
posted on
07/30/2003 7:28:15 PM PDT
by
Petronski
(I'm not always cranky.)
To: blam
To: RightWhale
"The green part in the middle doesn't look particularly healthy. Is that salt or copper causing the color?" I don't know. Check post #15, maybe your answer is there. I saw a documentary a few years ago about the locals complaining about being ill from the dust off the old lake bed.
The Salton Sea in California is a similar situation except that water sprinkling systems have been installed to hold down the dust.
Newcastle Disease In Salton Sea Cormorants
16
posted on
07/30/2003 8:11:11 PM PDT
by
blam
To: blam
So between people that want to move whole cities for an owl, to people who want to cut down every old growth tree in the forest, can we agree that as a society, we need to be better stewards of the environment? It drives me nuts when EVERY piece of environment legislation gets labled as extremist. The dems do it too. I'm thinking of their lousy forest maintenance ideas. Where is the party of common sense?
17
posted on
07/30/2003 8:24:16 PM PDT
by
KCmark
(I am NOT a partisan.)
To: blam
The only thing that bugs me about that site is that it consistently mispells "desiccation." I know it's counter-intuitive but look it up.
To: Nick Danger
Umm, weren't these communist countries when these irrigation projects started?
We got environmentalists and told them, Capitalists spend any amount of money even if it does destroy your precious nature. Well, at the time, the Soviet Union was the most polluted country in the world,
Oleg Danilovich Kalugin. Major General. Soviet KGB1
19
posted on
07/30/2003 9:42:09 PM PDT
by
DPB101
To: blam; Luis Gonzalez; JohnHuang2; rdb3; mhking; Trueblackman; BlkConserv; radiohead; Tuco-bad; ...
"The independent states of Central Asia are now joined in an association to manage the waters that feed the Aral but in practice there is little agreement among them on how best to share the resource."
It's The Tragedy of the Commons, writ large.
The Tragedy of the Commons is what happens when you have "Group rights" or "collective rights" rather than individual rights.
The classic example of a Tragedy of the Commons is in Africa, where two or more tribes "share" a common hunting area given to them by their government.
Well, the financial incentive for each tribe is to hunt as much as possible, under the theory that whatever their tribe doesn't kill and sell, the other tribes will get.
So these common lands are hunted into oblivion, and once the animals are all gone, then there is no more hunting in that common land, and no more food and income for any of the tribes.
To cover up this fundamental flaw of socialism (i.e. the government gives land to groups to be shared), leftists around the world use such phrases as "sustainable development" and "sustainable growth" and "sustainable grazing" along with the classic "sustainable hunting". Thus, the socialists claim that if these tribes are limited and restricted well-enough by the government, that the activities in these common areas can be sustained rather than exploited until nothing is Left (pun intended).
But the "sustainable" policies are merely band-aids. The core problem is that individuals don't have property rights in the areas that are being exploited into oblivion.
A rancher who owns his own spread won't go wipe out all of the game animals on his property as fast as he can kill and trap them, for instance. This is because the rancher, as a **property owner**, knows that it's far better to have viable herds on his property over the long term than to kill them all right now for a single "good" year at the market.
But the African bushman who is given access to a shared area is placed into a hyper-competitive race to see who can get the most, or even anything at all, before all of the prizes (read: natural resources) are taken by the others who also have access to that common area.
Ditto for common grazing areas, and as this article notes (and as I quoted above), so too for common access to lake water for irrigation. All of the nations that share access to the Aral are exploiting as fast as they can, lest someone else take their water first and leave them with nothing.
Of course, The Tragedy of the Commons means that they will eventually receive nothing, anyway. In fact, it will happen sooner, rather than later.
And it will happen because Socialism in particular, and Leftism is general, is a **flawed** ideology.
20
posted on
07/30/2003 10:07:39 PM PDT
by
Southack
(Media bias means that Castro won't be punished for Cuban war crimes against Black Angolans in Africa)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-39 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson