Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: XJarhead
I cannot believe a person with those academic credentials could ask such a stupid question. The genetic variation and natural selection argument seemingly cuts that to ribbons.

I cannot believe that somebody as smart as you can't see the problem. If sex evolved, how could it evolve without some means of transmissible genetic variation?

18 posted on 07/30/2003 9:15:05 AM PDT by r9etb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]


To: r9etb
If sex evolved, how could it evolve without some means of transmissible genetic variation?

Mutations. You're going to get way more variation over time with sexual transmission of variation than you would likely get from having to rely on mutations of self-replicating organizisms. Plus, a successful mutation will spread far more rapidly where there is sex than where there is none. If there is a successful mutation of one self-replicating "female", that mutation can be passed on only to that female's offspring. But if you have a successful mutation in a male, that success can be passed on to a much larger number of females.

60 posted on 07/30/2003 1:52:23 PM PDT by XJarhead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson