Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: chilepepper
IMHO IPv6 is totally unnecessary because of -- NAT

NAT is a stopgap and doesn't address the underlying problem, only delaying it. NAT works well because of certain assumptions about network infrastructure that are less and less true every day. We are rapidly approaching the day when everyone will have (at least) one /30 (or its IPv6 equivalent) assigned to them, which will burn up the address space very quickly NAT or not.

18 posted on 07/28/2003 1:58:52 PM PDT by tortoise (All these moments lost in time, like tears in the rain.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]


To: tortoise
We are rapidly approaching the day when everyone will have (at least) one /30 (or its IPv6 equivalent) assigned to them, which will burn up the address space very quickly NAT or not.

I bet one of the desires is that each person be assigned an IP to allow their internet activities to be much more easily tracked.

32 posted on 07/28/2003 2:58:08 PM PDT by Lazamataz (PROUDLY POSTING WITHOUT READING THE ARTICLE SINCE 1999!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson