Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

IPV6 is slowly on the way. no difference for the average user, but lots of work on the infrastructure underneath the hood.
1 posted on 07/28/2003 1:36:13 PM PDT by glorgau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: glorgau
As much of the world nears an Internet address crunch, North America stands as an island apart, threatening to fragment plans for the biggest overhaul of the Web in decades.

I see it's somehow become North America's fault.

2 posted on 07/28/2003 1:37:42 PM PDT by Cyber Liberty (© 2003, Ravin' Lunatic since 4/98)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: glorgau
The resulting list of IP addresses is two googols long

This is the first time I've seen the use of the word googol outside of being used as the answer to a trivia question or in an anecdote as an oddity. That is, indeed, a tremendous number.

3 posted on 07/28/2003 1:41:19 PM PDT by D. Brian Carter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: glorgau
So how are IP addresses represented in v6? No more 255.255.255.255-style addresses?

}:-)4
4 posted on 07/28/2003 1:41:33 PM PDT by Moose4 (I'm the moose, bring on the cheese...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: glorgau
And here is a googol (not Google) bump for you.
5 posted on 07/28/2003 1:43:46 PM PDT by D. Brian Carter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: glorgau
And now that I'm on a googol kick, something interesting from the googol.com website:

Googolhedron - A 3 dimensional shape bounded by 1 x 10^100 similar polygons. This shape would look very much like a sphere. Having this many sides or facets would make it smoother than any man made object. Although, you could never have a googolhedron because there are not a googol particles in the universe.

I find it quite amazing that we're actually dealing with a number here (with IPv6) that outnumbers the amount of particles in the universe. I'm not a mathematician, I'm blonde, and easily impressed, but this just boggles my mind.
8 posted on 07/28/2003 1:48:04 PM PDT by D. Brian Carter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: glorgau
threatening to fragment plans for the biggest overhaul of the Web in decades.

Yeah it's needed an overhaul for at least a decade or two...

10 posted on 07/28/2003 1:49:18 PM PDT by steveo (I'm so hungry I could eat at Arby's)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: glorgau
Established five years ago, IPv6 creates enough IP addresses for every person on Earth to have 1,000 Web-enabled devices

I think somebody missed a few zeros. 1000 x 6 billion is 6 trillion, yes? Isn't that a whole lot less than 2 googol?

12 posted on 07/28/2003 1:52:06 PM PDT by ko_kyi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: glorgau
"....which some fear could run short of addresses in Asia and Europe within the next few years."

Well, boo-freaking-boo-hoo!! The US should speed up the process and let the developing world, which we should take to mean all of Europe and Asia, get an idea of how many different ways there are for them to taste the long-overdue sword.

And let's begin with France, the clymer-wipe nation who so arrogantly has banned the term "e-mail" from its sainted vocabulary..................

13 posted on 07/28/2003 1:52:07 PM PDT by tracer (/b>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: glorgau
I throw this thought out for discussion: comments please

IMHO IPv6 is totally unnecessary because of -- NAT

it seems to me that security has driven the typical network configuration of N machines into a secluded subnet hidden behind a NAT (network address translation proxy router/firewall/etc), which allows N machines to use far, far fewer IP addresses.

So, is this going to be enough to make IPv6 irrelevant? there is NO question that it has slowed it down tremendously. I distinctly recall shrill warnings that the much ballyhoed IP crunch was upon us... then nothing!

has NAT been enough, or will Microsoft, the Communist Chinese and the US Security Agencies try to push through IPv6 as a trojan horse to foist this change upon us, in order to control licenses, dissent or terrorism as deemed important not necessarily in the latter order as deemed important by the former order of interested parties?

14 posted on 07/28/2003 1:52:10 PM PDT by chilepepper (The map is not the territory -- Alfred Korzybski)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: glorgau
One thing worth pointing out is that there's probably not going to be one day when the whole world drops IPv4 and starts using IPv6 (like there was supposedly one day in Sweden when they switched from driving on the left like the Brits to driving on the right like us). It's probably going to be a much more complex and fluid situation with IPv6 being tunneled inside of IPv4 packets, and vice versa.
19 posted on 07/28/2003 1:59:54 PM PDT by 2 Kool 2 Be 4-Gotten
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: glorgau
This whole mess is due primarily to the idiot practices of network mapping in Asia. It is not the fault of the United States in any way. At present, IPv4 can accommodate over FOUR BILLION unique IPs. Were this applied intelligently with NAT'd LANs, this address space could easily last us at least another 20 years.

Sadly, the Asian nations have gone out of their way to p!ss away all the address space they've been allocated and have been snapping up Class A netblocks like they're going out of style. (As a consequence, the entire IPv4 space is going out of style!)

Hell, the Japanese only recently acquired the 43/8 Class A netblock and already they're spewing spam like there's no tomorrow! These people are either so corrupt or so incompetent that they can't even control the network space they already have. Putting them on IPv6 space is going to be like putting an alcholic in charge of a winery.

Ah well...eventually we'll all switch over to IPv6. That's fine with me. I'm already scripting out how I'm going to blackhole all of Asia when that time comes.

-Jay

27 posted on 07/28/2003 2:26:15 PM PDT by Jay D. Dyson (Leftists are like any other lower life form...they devour their own when it suits their purpose.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: glorgau
That means more jobs.

All outsourced to India.

30 posted on 07/28/2003 2:55:15 PM PDT by Lazamataz (PROUDLY POSTING WITHOUT READING THE ARTICLE SINCE 1999!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: glorgau
It's great that when Al Gore invented the internet, he allocated 70% of the addresses to the US.
38 posted on 07/28/2003 3:24:32 PM PDT by Paleo Conservative (Do not remove this tag under penalty of law.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: glorgau
"Backers of the address-system change said new technologies that give Web access to unlikely devices will accelerate the depletion of the IPv4 address pool even in the United States."

The Japanese invented the internet-connected toilet. It takes your pulse, your blood pressure, your weight, and a urinalysis and e-mails it to your doctor or hospital.

My question: what if hackers gain access to your toilet?

Gigantic rolling sign in Times Square: "JOE SMITH HAS BOWEL MOVEMENT..."

--Boris

42 posted on 07/28/2003 6:45:26 PM PDT by boris (The deadliest Weapon of Mass Destruction in History is a Leftist With a Word Processor)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: glorgau
IPV6 is slowly on the way. no difference for the average user, but lots of work on the infrastructure underneath the hood.

I'm against it. If IPv4 was good enough for Jesus, it's good enough for me. :)

49 posted on 07/29/2003 12:08:34 PM PDT by asformeandformyhouse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: glorgau
BTTT
53 posted on 07/29/2003 12:16:26 PM PDT by Fiddlstix (~~~ http://www.ourgangnet.net ~~~~~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: glorgau
I think part of the problem is akin to some of the silliness going on in Microsoft O/S's: Not everything belongs on the Internet!

When the everything-should-have-an-IP-address insanity boils off and more people understand NAT (My employer, for example, is only NOW beginning to transition away from a network of all-Internet-legal-IPs-for-everything to a 192.168.x.x private network) the problem will probably just go away.

Even a googol-googol addresses won't be enough if ignorance abounds.

55 posted on 08/20/2007 12:35:58 PM PDT by TChris (The Republican Party is merely the Democrat Party's "away" jersey - Vox Day)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson