Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: wkcoop
Found in a search:

Dewhurst said once a second session begins, he will not allow the use of a "blocker" bill -- a long-standing Senate practice that empowers the chamber's minority by requiring a two-thirds vote to open debate.

A blocker is an insignificant bill placed at the top of the Senate agenda. Because rules require that bills be considered in agenda order, debate on legislation behind the blocker bill requires a two-thirds vote to suspend rules.

That means 11 of the 31 members can block debate on a bill if all are in attendance. At present, 11 Democrats and one Republican in the Senate have pledged to vote against debate.

If, in a second special session, Dewhurst placed redistricting first on the agenda without a blocking bill, a simple majority could bring it to the floor for debate.

Dewhurst said he has precedent for that. He noted that then-Lt. Gov. Bob Bullock did not use a blocker bill when the Senate debated redistricting in a 1992 special legislative session.

"I feel obliged to follow the Bullock precedent and put redistricting first," Dewhurst said.

The 1992 special session was intended to set aside a state Senate redistricting plan ordered by a Republican federal court. Democrats pushed through a plan on a partisan 18-12 vote, with three Democrats joining the Republican minority.

Republican senators did not publicly object to the Senate procedures during that special session, which occurred in the middle of candidate filing for the primaries.

The federal court rejected the Senate's map and ordered its own map used for the election. That map gave Republicans four additional state Senate seats.

Lt. Gov. Bill Hobby also tried to avoid a blocker bill in the 1979 regular session to pass legislation creating a presidential primary favorable to the Republican presidential bid of former Gov. John Connally. Twelve Democrats, who became known as the Killer Bees, broke the Senate quorum to kill the bill.

Dewhurst noted that when Hobby threatened to remove the blocker bill in a 1989 special session on workers' compensation insurance, he broke a deadlock and launched negotiations that resulted in passage of a bill.

He said he hopes the same thing occurs this year on congressional redistricting.

"We're engaged in conversation. We have a great tradition of working together in the Senate," Dewhurst said.

He said he also feels confident that the Democrats will not walk out on a second special session.

"We're not going down that road," Dewhurst said. "I expect all of our Democrat senators will work together and we won't be facing the lack of a quorum."

One potential face-saving option for the opponents would be to vote "present and not voting" on the question of bringing a redistricting bill to the floor for debate in this special session. That would allow the Senate majority to pass the bill and avoid a second special session, while the opposition would not have a record of voting for it.

"No decisions have been made at the caucus level," Van de Putte said.

Dewhurst said all he wants is a "fair" redistricting plan. He said that would result in Republicans holding 19 or 20 of the state's congressional seats, "plus Ralph Hall."

Hall, D-Rockwall, frequently votes for President Bush's Republican agenda.

Democrats now hold a 17-15 majority in the state's congressional delegation. Republicans argue that because they hold all the state elective offices and a majority in the Legislature, they also should have a congressional delegation majority.

A map passed by the state House probably would give the GOP 21 seats in the U.S. House. A proposed Senate plan could give the GOP as many as 22 U.S. House seats.

Sen. Jeff Wentworth, R-San Antonio, offered the Senate Jurisprudence Committee another option Friday.

It likely would defeat as many as five incumbent Democratic congressmen, but it would guarantee only 16 Republican and 13 Democratic seats, while three districts would be Republican-leaning but competitive.

"We shouldn't have a map that has 22 Republican districts to only 10 Democratic districts, because this state is not a 70 percent Republican state. It's about 55 to 60 (percent Republican)," Wentworth said.

Dewhurst warns Dems: cooperate or face defeat

34 posted on 07/28/2003 1:52:47 PM PDT by ravingnutter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: ravingnutter
WE have so much political cover. If we can have some kind of debate then it makes their point moot. They will just be seen as ineffective and stupid. There will be nothing the press can do to us. either way we win. I say make the bill so lop sided that they really loose big.
62 posted on 07/28/2003 2:55:01 PM PDT by grapeape (Hope is not a method. - Gen. Hugh Shelton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]

To: ravingnutter
If the Texas State Constitution can be used to stuff it down the rats throats, then it will happen!

rats have a proven self preservation instinct over the centuries, and our furry leftists in the Texas Senate/House will play every game they can to make sure they survive.

We just got rid of another one with the election of Bob Duell in our district. One by one!

VISUALIZE NO LIBERALS!

126 posted on 07/28/2003 7:05:51 PM PDT by oldtimer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]

To: ravingnutter
Interesting, but 2-3 of the State senators live in the same HI Rise complex as I do. They've had the whole bunch of them, including staffers, at Senator McClelland's condo burning the midnight oil, until after 2 AM one night.

I can see them from our parking lot.
161 posted on 07/28/2003 11:13:54 PM PDT by Gracey (what's a tag line?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]

To: ravingnutter
Dewhurst got played. He'll either get a grip and break this BS or we'll hold him equally responsible at the next election.

Dems and Pubs have for many years gone along to get along in this state because there honestly wasn't much difference between them. But the Texas Dem party has become infected by the National Dem Party.

Time to play hardball, at the state level as well as on the National level (judges). Dems don't play nice. We shouldn't either.
182 posted on 07/29/2003 7:27:43 AM PDT by Athelas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson