Posted on 07/28/2003 8:28:29 AM PDT by yonif
![]() |
w w w . h a a r e t z d a i l y . c o m |
![]() |
|
Last update - 14:05 28/07/2003
Rivlin: PM foresees Palestine on more than 42% of West BankBy Haaretz Service
Knesset Speaker Reuven Rivlin, until recently a close political confidante of Prime Minister Ariel Sharon, said Monday that the future Palestinian state foreseen by Sharon will have borders larger than the 42 percent of the West Bank currently under nominal Palestinian Authority control. Rivlin, a Likud stalwart and onetime principal defender of Sharon, Monday slammed the prime minister's policies, saying that his acceptance of the road map peace plan is turning Israel "irrelevant" with respect to Washington's policymaking considations. Sharon has hinted in the past that he could agree to a Palestinian state in the Gaza Strip and in the West Bank corresponding roughly to the PA territory ceded by Israel in past peace accords. But Rivlin said Monday that when "the prime minister speaks of the establishment of a Palestinian state, it is not simply a change of title or a declaration of name change from the Palestinian Authority to a palestinian state. "We are not talking about 42 percent here, and whoever thinks that the Americans will agree to 42 percent, doesn't know what he's talking about," Rivlin told Army Radio. He did not elaborate, other than to say that Sharon still believes that Israel's permanent border with a Palestinian state must include security zones on West Bank ridges overlooking central Israel and in the Jordan Rift valley. Rivlin spoke as Sharon landed in the United States for talks in the coming days with President George Bush and top administration officials. Sharon has led efforts to broaden concessions to the Palestinians this week, expanding the criteria for an expected prisoner release to include members of Hamas and the Islamic Jihad. The Knesset speaker was one of a number of Israeli rightists, among them members of Sharon's Likud, who expressed reservations Monday over the direction of the prime minister's policies. "I am certainly concerned. With all the admiration and trust I have in the prime minister, and my trust is unqualified, I am full of worries regarding the issues as they are developing," Rivlin told Army Radio. "The principle fear is that Israel is turning irrelevant in the Americans' considerations. Not only in tactical considerations, intended to shore up Abu Mazen, rather in an entire course that will in the end lead to an inevitable, crashing downfall." According to Rivlin, Sharon was in danger of causing Israel to lose much of the "American attention to Israel's uncompromising interests." Rivlin said that government officials have tried to explain away with "grave, lame excuses" the Bush administration's decision not to accept Sharon's 14 reservations to the road map. Lacking the reservations, Rivlin said, "We are speaking here of a move in which the compromise is All or Nothing," with the language of the road map strongly hinting at a complete Israeli withdrawal to the borders that existed before the 1967 Six Day War. He compared Israel's situation to a very heavy automobile, which can be controlled only by going very slowly. "Even an excellent driver like Israel's prime minister Ariel Sharon, when he drives 50, 60, even 70 kilometers per hour, heaven forbid, can lose the brakes and then we will let go of control."
|
|
/hasen/objects/pages/PrintArticleEn.jhtml?itemNo=323019 |
![]() |
close window |
According to Rivlin, Sharon was in danger of causing Israel to lose much of the "American attention to Israel's uncompromising interests."
Rivlin said that government officials have tried to explain away with "grave, lame excuses" the Bush administration's decision not to accept Sharon's 14 reservations to the road map.
Lacking the reservations, Rivlin said, "We are speaking here of a move in which the compromise is All or Nothing," with the language of the road map strongly hinting at a complete Israeli withdrawal to the borders that existed before the 1967 Six Day War.
Yeah. People on FR are supposed to be people who support freedom and our great republic. I cannot understand why they would not be making a big deal, organizing protests, etc. against Bush who has brought into the White House (again, this time under his watch) an anti-Semitic, holocaust denier, terrorist murderer (of also Americans), financier of the Munich olympics massacre person who has been Arafat's second in command since 1964.
If it was a democrat, they would be going crazy.
Don't push Sharon too far, Mr. President
It's worth noting a successor may be less, rather than more, flexible
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.