Replies

Take a look at my post history, I am not a liberal lurker.

On the other hand, I'm starting to think that Bush is the liberal lurker in the White House.

He has caved to the 'rats on many spending and public policy issues, and now is coddling Palestinian terrorists. I don't know what to make of the guy.

First it was the 'rats fault - we all thought that if Bush could get the majority in both houses during the last election, we would see some real tax and regulatory rollback. Instead, we have a growing federal bureaucracy, more PC language about the nature of our enemy, support for Arafat through his agent, terrorist financier abu Mazen, billions wasted on worthless AIDS drugs for Africa, jobs are still going overseas to communist China, we are being invaded by illegal immigrants, we now have nationalized perscription Hillarycare for seniors, and general co-option of the Liberal agenda.

The vast number of issues on which Bush has wavered and finally come down on the wrong side of is staggering.

I've said it before and I'll say it again - I wish Bush had a credible threat who would run against him in the Republican primary.

None of the 'rats are even an option, but Bush isn't such a great choice, either.

He has caved to the 'rats on many spending and public policy issues, and now is coddling Palestinian terrorists. I don't know what to make of the guy.

The same dispute was railed against Ronald Reagan in the early '80's. "Reaganomics" as it was implemented was a good thing for the economy as history dictates.