This is the best that Non-Sequitur can muster on the toxic question of the intent of the Federals versus the intent of the Confederates - a weak slap at dead people who appear to be the true heirs of the Founders. This is presuming, of course, that the peculiar institution would have continued to the present day.
We know what the present day looks like in the North of the Civil War. At least four-fifths of the heirs of the Federals in the Northeast are slaves to Fat Teddy Kennedy and Hillary Clinton. Vote fraud is rampant on the great Democrat plantations in Pennsylvania, Michigan and Illinois, where the black slaves receive their sinecure, but no education, for increasing the number of Democrat votes yearly. ;-)
Nonsense. Regardless of whether slavery ended down south 20 years after the war, 50 years after the war or 100 years after the war that does not change the fact that the reason you claim that they had for their rebellion, "to practice the Original Principles of Government established by the Founders", would have been to the benefit of only a minority of the southerners, and would have completely excluded a third of the population.
Yep. The blind have eyes, yet cannot see.