Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: 4ConservativeJustices; GOPcapitalist; thatdewd
I've studied the War Between the States for many years now.

Something struck me the other day when I was watching Gods and Generals.

Would the South have invaded the North to its furthest reaches in order to subjugate it totally had the Confederates been victorious?

We know that the North did just that with the prostrate South, but the evidence is that the South desired no such thing, and in fact the nature of its rebellion actually precluded a total invasion and subjugation of its opponent.

85 posted on 07/28/2003 7:32:07 PM PDT by an amused spectator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies ]


To: an amused spectator
Would the South have invaded the North to its furthest reaches in order to subjugate it totally had the Confederates been victorious?

Nope. They just wanted to be left alone.

88 posted on 07/28/2003 8:35:46 PM PDT by 4CJ (Come along chihuahua, I want to hear you say yo quiero taco bell. - Nolu Chan, 28 Jul 2003)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies ]

To: an amused spectator
the nature of its rebellion actually precluded a total invasion and subjugation of its opponent.

Absolutely. To be left alone to practice the Original Principles of Government established by the Founders were all they wanted.

89 posted on 07/28/2003 9:09:26 PM PDT by thatdewd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson