Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 07/27/2003 4:47:52 PM PDT by mhking
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: mhking
NIMBY. NIMBY NIMBY NIMBYNIMBYNIMBY...

That's the cry of the limousine liberal.
2 posted on 07/27/2003 4:50:29 PM PDT by petuniasevan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mhking
Energy is the lifeblood of civilization.

Greenies hate everything about civilization: people,kids,energy,intellect,technology,etc,etc.

3 posted on 07/27/2003 4:52:37 PM PDT by AdamSelene235 (Like all the jolly good fellows, I drink my whiskey clear....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mhking
Those things are a vast field of eyesores. The ones that line the highway going toward Palm Springs are just nasty looking pieces of industrial trash. Can't say that I blame the folks in Nantucket. Now, why are they trying to push them into the Chesapeake Bay!!?? Do you suppose I like them trashing my ~public~ view anymore than they like their ~public~ view contaminated?
4 posted on 07/27/2003 4:53:09 PM PDT by OpusatFR (Using pretentious arcane words to buttress your argument means you don't have one)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mhking
"Kennedy doesn't want a wind farm on Nantucket Sound, where his family might see it from their elegant compound in Hyannis Port. Veteran newsman Walter Cronkite doesn't want Gordon's wind farm here either. Cronkite likes to sail on Nantucket Sound."

So-oo typical. Limousine liberals want all the taxing and regulation to hurt other people while they use those same regulations to secure their priveleged lifestyles.

6 posted on 07/27/2003 5:01:43 PM PDT by BenLurkin (Socialism is slavery.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mhking
One of the primary requirements of being a liberal, besides checking your brain at the door, is to be an unabashed hypocrite in all things.
7 posted on 07/27/2003 5:02:07 PM PDT by ABG(anybody but Gore) (Dammit Jim, I'm a doctor, not a Tagline!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mhking
The group's president, Isaac Rosen, complains ... and says, "I think building turbines, building machinery in an area where people go to get away from industry, to get away from machinery is wrong."

Just how does a mammal with no fins or webbing get six miles out into the ocean without the help of machines? Without the help of technology these whackos are fish bait.

12 posted on 07/27/2003 5:30:25 PM PDT by LoneRangerMassachusetts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mhking
You can't put one in Kennedy's or Cronkite's backyard, but the two of them would support putting them in my or your backyards.

They would even support taking all your property.
15 posted on 07/27/2003 5:38:55 PM PDT by philetus (Keep doing what you always do and you'll keep getting what you always get)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mhking
Why Are 'Environmentalists' Opposing Windmills in Nantucket Sound?

I can hear it now...

There once was Don Quixote from Nantucket....

17 posted on 07/27/2003 5:51:11 PM PDT by uglybiker (Death Before Decaf!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mhking
Bed-wetting Liberals hate windmills because they turn to the right...
20 posted on 07/27/2003 6:22:26 PM PDT by pabianice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mhking
On the one hand the project is going to get 28 million a year, for ever, from the taxpayer. I'm against that. Further, it isn't a friendly or efficient way to make energy. So, strike two. However, to me anyways, if it it drives these fagu fakes up the wall, I'm for it. By the way, the Hudson Riverkeepers and Robert Kennedy and all the Hudson trust fund greenies were against a power line coming down around Storm Mountian on the Hudson and had it moved to a more working class route.
22 posted on 07/27/2003 6:26:26 PM PDT by Leisler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mhking
Was there anything, anytime, anywhere that a Kennedy or a Cronkite did altruistically. Wealthy, self-indulgent two-tongued peckerheads is what they are and they don't care about anything but themselves.
23 posted on 07/27/2003 6:34:46 PM PDT by mathurine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mhking
Nantucket Sound, where his family might see it from their elegant compound in Hyannis Port

The Kennedy's are known for their penetrating eyesight-when they are sober.

25 posted on 07/27/2003 7:07:38 PM PDT by AndyJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mhking
it seems to me I read the enviros were against these in CA claiming they were disruptive to migrating birds or some such nonsense. The truth is they just want us beholding to Big Brother.

As far as the rich folks go, it's selfishness. Yeah--I agree. Some of those boats they own are just PLAIN UGLY--and gas guzzlers too. But no one consults me before they buy.

oh, well. In the meantime, let's all exhale all at once and blow these jerks away!

26 posted on 07/27/2003 7:09:24 PM PDT by attagirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mhking
They are all sailors out there. Windfarms will affect recreational sailing, but each tower will have a light and a bell. Sailors are adaptible; they can adapt to windfarms.
27 posted on 07/27/2003 7:14:21 PM PDT by RightWhale (Destroy the dark; restore the light)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mhking
Seems like we've come full circle. Farmers got their electricity for years from their own private "windchargers". Why can't people just get their own?
28 posted on 07/27/2003 7:50:07 PM PDT by virgil
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mhking
especially areas where rich environmentalists like to spend the summer.

A developer is someone who wants to build a house in the woods. An environmentalist is someone who already owns a house in the woods.

We have a lot of the environmentalist wackos here in Arizona who moan about the loss of all the beautiful desert. Of course, what they mean is the loss of all the beautiful desert around their own homes, as neighboring landowners claim the same rights to build as the malcontent greenies exercised previously. Every one of these hypocritical scum lives in a house on a site that was once bare virgin desert, but they are quite happy to make rules preventing the rest of us doing likewise.

And of course, outside the immediate Phoenix area there is beautiful virgin desert by the thousands of square miles, much of it already off-limits to development, and the rest unlikely to be developed even after a thousand years at the current rate.

-ccm

31 posted on 07/27/2003 10:23:09 PM PDT by ccmay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mhking
I once new a man from Nantucket.

His... oh nevermind.

33 posted on 07/28/2003 12:07:49 AM PDT by Rodney King (No, we can't all just get along.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson