[inkling]

The liberals are getting very shrill.

First off, Ann's whole act is shrillness. Second, by "the liberals" do you mean Dorothy Rabinowitz? The WSJ Editorial page?!

I guess what annoys me about these ersatz defenses of Coulter is their Buchanan-like absolutism. If you criticize St. Ann, you're a liberal and a traitor. A conservative isn't allowed to disagree with her for any reason since to do so would make that person a RINO/Liberal/Traitor.

If Ann is going to pad her generous bank account by constantly blasting others, she should have a little thicker skin when people reasonably disagree with her.

[kylaka]

"If you criticize St. Ann, you're a liberal and a traitor".

Ann hasn't said that, nor have I implied it. Jumping from telling someone they are wrong to calling them traitor is a big jump.

If you call a desire to spin the wheel in the opposite direction shrill fanatisism, so be it. Conservatives have barely begun to slow it down, let alone change the direction.

As far as the RINO's go, aiding and abetting isn't treason, but its not helpful either. Especially when the other side thinks truth is not absolute.

[Brian Allen]

<< If Ann is going to pad her generous bank account .... >>

Your animus is showing again.

No: Make that "still."

And you don't "disagree" with Ms Coulter any more than did Rabinowitz. You simply give vent to your animus.

As did Rabinowitz.

[HISSKGB]

How leftie of you to worry about the money Coulter may earn from people buying her book! Zinn and Ehrenwrong became wealthy by singing a song that the middle class should support the very lower class exploited by Zinn and Ehrenwrong.

Coulter spoke out. Lefties and pretend conservatives are squealing because they have no real defense against the truths she has named.

[ontos-on]

Still no substance from you. Do you disagree with the points Evans made about the Moss woman or not? All this other stuff about her being shrill and you're being tired and St. Ann etc. -- is more like you being shrill and empty and tiresome.