Replies

But it took some time before growing numbers of Catholics, Protestants, and Jews stepped forward to point out that when people advance their moral viewpoints in the public square, they are not imposing anything on anyone. They are proposing. That’s what citizens do in a democracy—we propose, we give reasons, we vote. It’s a very strange doctrine that would silence only religiously grounded moral viewpoints. And it’s very unhealthy for democracy when the courts—without clear constitutional warrant—deprive citizens of the opportunity to have a say in setting the conditions under which we live, work, and raise our children. This is the unveiled reason why the democrat criminal enterprise is so staunchly pushing their obstruction of Bush bench nominees ... the democrats seek to control the social engineering via their continued liberalization of our courts.

It was only after I started to look into how controversial issues like abortion and divorce were handled in other liberal democracies that I realized how my dean’s slogan has been used not only to silence religiously grounded views, but to silence all opposition to abortion. Can anyone cite any other court edict that gives a human being the unrestricted right to hire a serial killer to exterminate another alive individual human being? ... The Roe and Doe rulings have done EXACTLY that ... and democrats continue to defend that indefensible horror as if it is an enlightened social policy to exterminate alive prenatal human beings. The "D's" even have a man running for the presidential race nomination who has done abortions and is proud of that, though he will try his damndest to prevent the full truth from coming out before the boters because he and his criminal party know that Americans still consider aborticutionists to be the scum of the medical 'profession' ... but he'll be a high priest of the demon dems if he's ever elected President.