Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: teokee
From the article: Asked Friday night if he thought President Bush did a good job in taking out the brutal duo, Rep. Brad Sherman, D-Calif., told Fox News Channel's "Hannity & Colmes," "When President Clinton put together a magnificent military and handed it over to Bush, that's the person who deserves our credit."

Whaaaaaat?

Did the Toon train the troops himself or is he only responsible for making us have to deploy the National Guard in order to have the correct specialties on-scene.

If you look at the command and control performance, Bush=Iraq and Toon=Somalia. Which take-down exercise was successful? What was the difference between the two? Which one had the armor and the support from the top? Can anyone say "Blackhawk down?"

PS Rummy is working to undo the damage to the force structure that resulted from 8 years of KlinTOON. Isn't it nice to have the adults in charge again?

7 posted on 07/26/2003 9:20:43 AM PDT by NonValueAdded ("Either you are with us, or you are with the terrorists." GWB 9/20/01)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: NonValueAdded
If you look at the command and control performance, Bush=Iraq and Toon=Somalia. Which take-down exercise was successful? What was the difference between the two?
=======================================
But Bush was able to use the magnificent military he inherited from Clinton, while Clinton was limited by the enfeebled, emasculated military he had inherited from Reagan and Bush I.</SARCASM>>
59 posted on 07/26/2003 12:29:42 PM PDT by night reader
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson