While your figures are debatable, you still improperly grouped all *NIX products together, which is a false anology simply because not all virus for some *NIX products affect other *NIX products at all. This is a perfect example of the disengenuous arguments you people constantly make.
Once again, more proof that Windows closed-source "security" is just a disaster waiting to happen.
Your defense of Chineese hackers is sickening.
While your figures are debatable, you still improperly grouped all *NIX products together, which is a false anology simply because not all virus for some *NIX products affect other *NIX products at all.
It's not misleading at all. You claimed that Microsoft had the largest footprint. THAT was a very misleading claim. I showed that it was untrue...then you pull this red herring? Please.
This is a perfect example of the disengenuous arguments you people constantly make.
Pot -> Kettle -> Black
Once again, more proof that Windows closed-source "security" is just a disaster waiting to happen.
Your defense of Chineese hackers is sickening.
It's no defense of the hackers; it's a pure condemnation of the B.S. "security" that you claim Microsoft possesses. THAT is what is truly sickening.
-Jay