Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Social worker accused of seducing a child client(doing it for the children alert)
south bend tribune ^ | 7.25.03 | SARA TOTH

Posted on 07/25/2003 11:53:15 AM PDT by freepatriot32

ELKHART -- A 26-year-old social worker was charged this week, accused of seducing a child whose welfare she was supposed to supervise for the LaGrange County Department of Family and Children.

Tammy Ross, of Goshen, was charged Monday with felony child seduction in an incident that happened in mid-April in LaGrange County.

Child seduction occurs when someone of authority engages in sexual conduct with a person who is at least 16 years old but younger than 18.

A 17-year-old boy told a sheriff's deputy in May that he had been sexually involved with Ross, who was his case worker, according to court records.

In a taped meeting with sheriff officials, the victim said he went with Ross on April 12 to pick up belongings at his mother's home, according to court records. The boy said he and Ross had sexual intercourse and that Ross had performed oral sex on him while at his mother's house.

In a separate interview with sheriff officials, Ross said she handled this victim's case inappropriately but denied having sexual intercourse with him, according to court records.

LaGrange County Prosecutor Jeff Wible said child seduction charges are rare, but Ross' alleged actions are serious.

"The worst part of this case is she violated trust," Wible said. "This was a person she was supposed to provide some guidance for. She absolutely violated the trust."

LaGrange County officials said relations between Ross and the victim may also have occurred in Elkhart County, where Ross lives.

"Our investigation has revealed the fact it was possible that it happened also in Elkhart County," Wible said. "But I can't be certain about that."

As of Thursday, no charges had been filed against Ross in Elkhart County, said Bill Wargo, chief investigator for the Elkhart County prosecutor's office. Wargo also said Elkhart County was not conducting any investigation related to Ross' alleged actions.

Staff writer Sara Toth:

stoth@sbtinfo.com


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Editorial; Extended News; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Indiana
KEYWORDS: a; accused; alert; child; children; client; doing; for; it; of; seducing; social; the; worker
this is definitly someone that takes we gotta do it for the children a little bit to seriously
1 posted on 07/25/2003 11:53:16 AM PDT by freepatriot32
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: freepatriot32
The boy said he and Ross had sexual intercourse and that Ross had performed oral sex on him while at his mother's house.

Apparently, the young man didn't care for her technique.

2 posted on 07/25/2003 12:00:19 PM PDT by Cable225
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freepatriot32
What's really sad is that this might be the best thing Social Services did for the boy.
3 posted on 07/25/2003 12:17:05 PM PDT by Pearls Before Swine (South-south-west, south, south-east, east....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freepatriot32
Kids today know that it takes only an accusation, not proof, of sexual involvement with a minor to assure that a teacher or other authority figure never works in that job again.

There's a good chance that the kid was angry about something the social worker did, so he accused her of sexual involvement. Guilty or innocent, she just lost her career.

Male teachers are particularly vulnerable to this tactic.
4 posted on 07/25/2003 12:17:28 PM PDT by Anarchist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pearls Before Swine
LOL,,,she put the social into social services but I doubt the kid.
5 posted on 07/25/2003 12:32:51 PM PDT by cajungirl (no)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: freepatriot32
Somehow I think this kid is gonna be alright ...
6 posted on 07/25/2003 12:34:11 PM PDT by JmyBryan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freepatriot32
Either she did it, or social workers are finally getting caught up in the witchunt culture that they created.

Either way, justice will be served. Let's just hope she got her adoption bounty.
7 posted on 07/25/2003 12:46:41 PM PDT by moyden2000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freepatriot32
Shouldn't that be "doing it to the children bump"?
8 posted on 07/25/2003 12:58:27 PM PDT by Chewbacca (UAF Nanooks rifle team rules! Best in the nation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freepatriot32
Doesn't really ring with truth. When I was seventeen, if a 26 year old women had offered me *ahem*,services, I would have been most grateful and discrete. Honest.
9 posted on 07/25/2003 1:11:43 PM PDT by telebob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: telebob
Discreet.
10 posted on 07/25/2003 1:23:51 PM PDT by Old Professer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Old Professer
Sorry. Discreet, not discrete. My brain can only handle analog or discrete input.
11 posted on 07/25/2003 1:38:26 PM PDT by telebob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Anarchist
Well I know in TN, these kind of social workers are paid minimum wage by the state. They are often foreign nationals or recent immigrants and don't speak good english. The state hides behind "policies" instead of hiring competent care workers.

The turnover among the social workers is high, because workers soon find out that they can make $3-$4 more an hour at the local oil change place. The only workers who stay with it for so little pay are either very charitable and love the work, pretty much incompetent with no iniative, or have alternative reasons for staying in that role.

I don't know if that's the case in this situation or not.
12 posted on 07/25/2003 2:11:05 PM PDT by DannyTN (Note left on my door by a pack of neighborhood dogs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: freepatriot32
The boy said he and Ross had sexual intercourse and that Ross had performed oral sex on him while at his mother's house.

In a separate interview with sheriff officials, Ross said she handled this victim's case inappropriately but denied having sexual intercourse with him, according to court records.

This report leaves some gaping holes. Is her denial that she and the kid had intercourse but admission that she was "inappropriate" a de facto confession that oral sex occurred?

13 posted on 07/25/2003 2:11:13 PM PDT by L.N. Smithee (Just because I don't think like you doesn't mean I don't think for myself)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: L.N. Smithee
She's obviously using Clinton's definition of what sex IS.
14 posted on 07/25/2003 2:39:53 PM PDT by Graybeard58
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: freepatriot32
When you hear somebody say her actions were "inappropriate," you know you're dealing with a felon.
15 posted on 07/25/2003 5:21:14 PM PDT by Bonaparte
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freepatriot32
Did you forget? Oral sex isn't really sex. And besides, it depends on what the meaning of the word "is" is.
16 posted on 07/25/2003 6:04:35 PM PDT by ThorSinger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson