Posted on 07/25/2003 8:22:10 AM PDT by RogueIsland
Press Release
Iowans for the Prevention of Gun Violence
4403 1st Avenue, SE
Cedar Rapids, IA 52402
Phone: 319-743-7823
Bill Would Meet Original Intent of Congress to Protect Americans and Law Enforcement Personnel
Cedar Rapids, IA - Iowans for the Prevention of Gun Violence (IPGV) today (July 21st) announced its strong support for legislation introduced in the Senate to renew the federal assault weapons ban. The legislation, introduced by Senators Frank Lautenberg (D-NJ) and Jon Corzine (D-NJ), would not only make the federal ban on assault weapons and high-capacity magazines permanent, but it would also significantly strengthen current law to meet the original intent of Congress. The Senate bill (S. 1431) is a companion bill to the "Assault Weapons Ban and Law Enforcement Protection Act of 2003", introduced in the House of Representatives in May by Reps. Carolyn McCarthy (D-NY) and John Conyers (D-MI).
The federal assault weapons ban (AWB) was enacted by Congress in 1994 as part of the Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act. However, the current AWB has a time limit of 10 years and will expire on September 13, 2004, unless reauthorized by the 108th Congress and signed into law by President Bush. Both President Bush and Attorney General John Ashcroft have stated their support for the assault weapons ban. Ashcroft has said that the ban is constitutional.
"Assault weapons are weapons of war. They are designed to hose down individuals with a spray of lethal bullets. They have no place in a civil society," noted John Johnson, IPGV's executive director.
Unfortunately, the current AWB has failed to meet the intent of Congress when it passed the ban in 1994. Gun manufacturers have been able to circumvent the ban by making small modifications to their weapons, renaming them, and marketing them as legal post-ban models. Examples are the Colt Match Target Rifle, Olympic Arms PCR-7 (stands for "politically correct rifle"), and Intratec AB-10 (stands for "after ban").
The limitations of the current AWB are well documented and known by gun violence prevention groups, the gun lobby, law enforcement, the media, and Congress. The Lautenberg bill would address these concerns, with measures including a redefinition of the term "assault weapon" to include any semiautomatic rifle, shotgun, or pistol that can accept a detachable magazine and includes one listed additional assault feature such as a pistol grip, fore-end grip, or collapsible stock. This crucial improvement recognizes the characteristics that make an assault weapon especially lethal.
Kirsten Meredith, IPGV's communications director said, "While the gun industry has blatantly evaded the current law and continued to manufacture and sell post-ban assault weapons, Americans continue to die. One of every five law enforcement officers killed in the line of duty are killed with assault weapons -- many times copycat models that do not fall under the current ban."
Iowans for the Prevention of Gun Violence considers that military-style, semiautomatic assault weapons constitute an unreasonable risk of death and injury to all Americans, especially law enforcement personnel who must deal with criminals who possess these weapons. Therefore, IPGV supports the Lautenberg bill to renew and strengthen the federal assault weapons ban to meet the original intent of Congress.
Thank Senators Lautenberg and Corzine for their commitment to keeping assault weapons off our streets! Express your support for the bill (S. 1431) they have introduced to renew the assault weapons ban!
The Honorable Frank Lautenberg
United States Senate
324 Hart Senate Office Bldg.
Washington, DC 20510
Phone: 202-224-3224
The Honorable Jon Corzine
United States Senate
Washington, D.C. 20510
Phone: 202-224-4744
Thanks for your dedication to preventing gun death and injury in Iowa!
Date of Release: July 21, 2003
But will it escape Hastert's? I'm not AS worried about the house as I am the senate(which has a slight Anti-majority), but if another Columbine happens where suburban white kids get killed, especially with a 'banned gun', then look out. I can see some 'compromise measure' passing.
I suspect this chump understands the difference perfectly. He's deliberately fogging the issue for those who don't know the difference, and since it's worked very well him in the past he's going to keep it up and get louder.
The best advice I've ever heard for countering this type of ignorance is to "take a liberal shooting." They'll have fun, learn important safety lessons, and learn that gun owners aren't all knuckle dragging, wife beating racists that they're portrayed to be.
Ah, now I get it!! I'm didn't realize they used leathal bullets. Shucks, I guess we better ban those leathal-bullet-spraying weapons of war.{/sarcasm}
Well, besides this not being up to him to determine, I view this statement as a bold-faced lie. This is a typical propaganda tactic of the gungrabbers, in making blanket statements with no references to back them up, to be swallowed whole by an ignorant and unthinking public at large. To my knowledge, Ashcroft has said no such thing.
I'm assuming, then, that Police and Law Enforcement will not be allowed to have these weapons either? Or are they not a part of a civil society? Doubt it!
I think a lot of our (gun owners) current problems with the type of firearms we can own began back when we (NRA actually) accepted the idea of justifying firearms as being for "sporting purposes". A .22 short target rifle would meet that test. Hard to justify an AK as sporting when a .22 will meet the requriement more easily.
Personally, I can't see strictly sporting rifles being protected by the 2nd. The 9th and 10th are for sports. But we're too busy trying to make the argument that an AK is really a sporting purpose firearm to worry about losing the word war in the arena of the general public (as in "you don't need an AK-47 to hunt Bambi").
FOPA. The Fireaarms Owners Protection Act of 1986. Signed into law by Ronald Reagan himself. How can you possibly object to protecting firearms onwers? Or to anything that our conservative hero Reagan did?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.