Me too. I'd developed a lot of respect for her thinking and opinions, especially on the WSJ TV show. But the pure emotional venom in her anti-Coulter piece was crystal clear to anyone who'd actually read "Treason." I guess we all have our blind spots but this is one that really disturbs me because it's a willful refusal to accept facts. Of course that's an affliction suffered by most "journalists." Getting back to your original question, making critical comments about a book you haven't read indicates total arrogance and reveals one as a fool.