To: Flurry
...waiting for the trial. That's why I threw OJ in there. He was acquited, yet pretty much everyone knows he was guilty. Enough money and fame can buy any justice you want. Kobe hired dirty lawyers (whitewater lawyers) for a reason. A guilty man has to use everything to win. With all the trash that's being spread about this women, he will win too. His guilt is irrelevant to the outcome.
To: StolarStorm
An accused person gets the best lawyer they can afford. Sometimes the guilty go free and sometimes the innocent go to jail. Have you got a better system? I'll listen. But OJ has nothing to do with Kobe. Have you really decided he is guilty without a trial. Hope you never get accused of anything. Supposed I accused you of a crime and the DA said you will be charged. Are you guilty? Or do you want a trial? At that trial are you just going to sit and wait to be convicted? Or are you going to hire the best lawyer you can? I didn't even know who Kobe was before BC I don't give a crap about the NBA. Let the system try him.
131 posted on
07/25/2003 7:24:11 AM PDT by
Conspiracy Guy
(!!!!!!! sdrawkcab si enilgat ym ,em pleh esaelP)
To: StolarStorm
Yeah, Kobe should defend himself at trial to satisfy your bizarre sense of fairness.
In fact, he should just admit guilt to spare the poor girl this smearing.
OJ was being tried in a MURDER case, surely you know that there are very few false murder charges(I'm not talking about having the wrong suspect.) You can make all kinds of defenses in murder cases without smearing anyone. IN a murder case there are also several different types of evidence, and OJ had mountains of it against him.
So far, we do not know what "mountains" there are against Bryant, and even if there is significant evidence, there will never be the same certainty as the OJ case.
139 posted on
07/25/2003 7:28:58 AM PDT by
Skywalk
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson