Great article.
Strangely, the Downing Street memos, which the Left has characterized as the smoking gun, only confirmed my views. After 911 the Administration decided Hussein was too dangerous to leave in power (He was a lightening rod for anti-American beliefs and actions and had a record of brutality and of using any means available to achieve his goals). George Friedman, in "America's Secret War", describes the Administration's shock at finding how little defense was possible against determined terrorism so its decision to pursue an offensive strategy is entirely reasonable.
The propanga used to sell the strategy - exagerating the immediacy of the threat (we had no proof of stockpiles of WMD or functional connections to Al Queda)- is entirely consistent with actions of all past Presidents who wished to justify military actions (Wilson and FDR both said they would not go to war, FDR provoked both the Germans and Japanese, "Remember the Maine" was largely unproved baloney as was Tonkin Bay, Mexico posed no threat to the US in 1845, etc).
We are in a war against a Muslim world view. Why not? Traditionally, the Muslims were not organized as nation states but as a theocracy spanning most of their conquests. The Islamists like bin Ladin seek to restore that organization. The only question is would sacrificing Israel moderate their conflict with us? My answer is no...or not enough to justify such an immoral act.