Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

George F. Will:President Bush has turned conservatism on its head, infuriating many supporters
The Union Leader, Manchester, NH ^ | July 24, 2003 | George F. Will

Posted on 07/24/2003 4:00:40 AM PDT by RJCogburn

Edited on 07/24/2003 4:39:12 AM PDT by Admin Moderator. [history]

THIS IS THE is the summer of conservatives? discontent. Conservatism has been disoriented by events in the last several weeks. Cumulatively, foreign and domestic developments constitute an identity crisis of conservatism, which is being recast ? and perhaps rendered incoherent.

George W. Bush may be the most conservative person to serve as President since Calvin Coolidge. Yet his Presidency is coinciding with, and is in some instances initiating or ratifying, developments disconcerting to four factions within conservatism. The faction that focuses on foreign policy has four core principles: Preserve U.S. sovereignty and freedom of action by marginalizing the United Nations. Reserve military interventions for reasons of U.S. national security, not altruism. Avoid peacekeeping operations that compromise the military?s war-fighting proficiencies. Beware of the political hubris inherent in the intensely unconservative project of ?nation-building.?


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: bushdoctrine; conservatism; georgefwill
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 241-260261-280281-300 ... 341-348 next last
To: carton253; Area51
It was just that your little list contained pork. As if "pork" is the President's fault.

Pork is the fault of whoever voted for and signed the bill. Bush is one person that deserves some blame for it.

261 posted on 07/24/2003 1:14:17 PM PDT by Dan from Michigan ("Say hello to my little friend!" - Tony Montana)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: Dan from Michigan
I hear ya. Getting rough out there!

262 posted on 07/24/2003 1:18:16 PM PDT by Area51
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 261 | View Replies]

To: Joe Hadenuf
That's right Fufkins! We should support Bush and stop the bitching, keep our mouths shut, and regardless of what Bush does, it's good for us. Don't break that lock step cadence and support no matter what. All these people that don't think Bush is a conservative are probably DU spies, and leftist operatives.

Joe you are such an ingrate. Dontchaknow that when Bush promotes Open Borders, Amnesties & SS for Illegal Aliens, MFN trade status for communist countries like China, staggering new entitlements like prescription drugs for seniors--it is all part of his strategery that is well past your ability to understand just how great this is. How could you possibly know what is going through GW’s great mind when he works so hard to screw help this great republic.

Don’t you see just how important it is that we not allow the Democrats to do the same thing? If you can’t grasp this then you are a No-Nothing Malcontent Loser that doesn’t want to be on the winning team. Good Bye.

263 posted on 07/24/2003 1:23:42 PM PDT by WRhine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 238 | View Replies]

To: Area51
I hear ya. Getting rough out there!

Why do Republicans in senate or presidencies seem to always beat themselves???

If Engler can win re-election here with 61% and 64%(He even won Ann Arbor and East Lansing the 2nd time) by cleaning up the mess and fiscal responsibility(Cut...cut..and cut again), why can't Bush and the senate do the same?

I'm beginning to expect a suprise in 04 unless the dems run some idiot like Kerry.

264 posted on 07/24/2003 1:25:40 PM PDT by Dan from Michigan ("Say hello to my little friend!" - Tony Montana)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 262 | View Replies]

To: austinTparty
Never give your own president any powers that you don't want the opposition to have...

Exactly. That's what scares me even about the "Patriot Act" in 2005.

265 posted on 07/24/2003 1:30:45 PM PDT by Dan from Michigan ("Say hello to my little friend!" - Tony Montana)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 194 | View Replies]

To: ArneFufkin
'Til then, you're just a group of obnoxious howler monkees with inch-long weiners.

Said the Great Sanctimonious Socialist Bloviator of FR.

266 posted on 07/24/2003 1:34:47 PM PDT by WRhine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 259 | View Replies]

To: Dan from Michigan
I'm beginning to expect a suprise in 04 unless the dems run some idiot like Kerry

Or Dean, Lieberman, Gephardt, Sharpton, Kucinich, et al.

Oh that's right, Dean was "pro-gun" in Vermont, even though he is against the war on terror, pro-abort, and makes Bill Clinton(not Hillary) look like Ronald Reagan.

Excuse me I forgot, you would probably vote for Dean.

267 posted on 07/24/2003 1:38:05 PM PDT by Dane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 264 | View Replies]

To: MrLeRoy
"Bush could be much more conservative and still be politically successful."

That's what's so frustrating to me, too. Dubyuh hasn't made the major gaffe like his daddy's flip-floppin' on his ReadMyLips pledge, but all-too-often his kneejerk reaction to conflict vis a vis domestic legislation seems to be to compromise away conservative principals. As noted by others, I can handle some compromise here and there if it seemed we were generally moving to the Right, but this ain't that.

FReegards...MUD

268 posted on 07/24/2003 1:45:25 PM PDT by Mudboy Slim (RE-IMPEACH Osama bil Clinton!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 161 | View Replies]

To: Dane
Excuse me I forgot, you would probably vote for Dean

No I won't, even if he ends up being more conservative than W.

I don't vote for dems.

269 posted on 07/24/2003 1:59:23 PM PDT by Dan from Michigan ("Say hello to my little friend!" - Tony Montana)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 267 | View Replies]

To: Sir Gawain
Yeah, the fact that Bush Sr. lost conservative votes is not his fault, it's his voters' fault.

Correct. It's the voters. Who else put Clinton in our White House? Fickle Conservatives are RINOs and are unreliable. They can not be counted on to keep the Liberals out of power.

270 posted on 07/24/2003 1:59:30 PM PDT by Consort
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 253 | View Replies]

To: Dan from Michigan
I don't vote for dems. (outside a primary)
271 posted on 07/24/2003 1:59:44 PM PDT by Dan from Michigan ("Say hello to my little friend!" - Tony Montana)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 269 | View Replies]

To: WRhine
Don’t you see just how important it is that we not allow the Democrats to do the same thing? If you can’t grasp this then you are a No-Nothing Malcontent Loser that doesn’t want to be on the winning team. Good Bye.

LOL...

272 posted on 07/24/2003 2:02:27 PM PDT by Joe Hadenuf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 263 | View Replies]

To: RJCogburn
Perhaps. Who has given socialism the big boost in the past couple of years....regarding the Medicare bill, the farm bill, the education bill.....?

Your word "perhaps" is the answer. When Bush 41 was abandoned for a Socialist, it boosted the influence of socialistic policy and it's coming back to bite us.

273 posted on 07/24/2003 2:04:53 PM PDT by Consort
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 256 | View Replies]

To: Consort
So who has given socialism the big boost in the paet couple of years?
274 posted on 07/24/2003 2:07:39 PM PDT by RJCogburn ("You have my thanks and, with certain reservations, my respect."......Lawyer J. Noble Daggett)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 273 | View Replies]

To: ArneFufkin
'Til then, you're just a group of obnoxious howler monkees with inch-long weiners.

LOL!

Fufkins, at first I thought you were a female with that name "Fufkins". Now, after that last comment, I am convinced you are a whiny 16 year old.

275 posted on 07/24/2003 2:07:42 PM PDT by Joe Hadenuf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 259 | View Replies]

To: Dane
You all on the other hand wring your hands and rationalize your helping the Clintons take the White House.

You shouldn't paint with such a broad brush. I was too young to vote in '92.

276 posted on 07/24/2003 2:09:22 PM PDT by Sir Gawain (Why was Sabertooth banned?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 257 | View Replies]

To: Consort
Your word "perhaps" is the answer. When Bush 41 was abandoned for a Socialist, it boosted the influence of socialistic policy and it's coming back to bite us.

Just something to think about...If Bush had won in '92, there would be no such thing as Free Republic today.

277 posted on 07/24/2003 2:12:46 PM PDT by jmc813 (Check out the FR Big Brother 4 thread! http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/943368/posts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 273 | View Replies]

To: Sir Gawain
You shouldn't paint with such a broad brush. I was too young to vote in '92

It shows.

278 posted on 07/24/2003 2:13:35 PM PDT by Dane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 276 | View Replies]

To: Stew Padasso
California (He backed Riordan instead of Bill Simon). He also didn't campaign for Schundler for NJ governor.
279 posted on 07/24/2003 2:14:38 PM PDT by Sparta (Check out my new blog, http://bayousage.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 131 | View Replies]

To: Dane
What are you doing posting on FR? You should be making millions with your comedic routine.
280 posted on 07/24/2003 2:15:54 PM PDT by Sir Gawain (Why was Sabertooth banned?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 278 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 241-260261-280281-300 ... 341-348 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson