Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Going Hypersonic: Flying FALCON for Defense
Science - Space.com ^ | July 23, 2003 | Tariq Malik

Posted on 07/24/2003 1:44:11 AM PDT by Iris7

A swift, powerful air strike can be an invaluable tool for U.S. military forces in battle, so long as it gets there fast enough, and the Department of Defense is developing just the aircraft for the job.

The Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) and the United States Air Force (USAF) are seeking contractors to build an unmanned hypersonic aircraft capable of reaching any point on the world map in about two hours. Though initially a creature of war, such an aircraft could eventually serve as a springboard into space, developing technology that could lead to a single-stage-to-orbit spacecraft.

The new aircraft is part of DARPA's Force Application and Launch from Continental United States (FALCON) program to build a reusable Hypersonic Cruise Vehicle (HCV) by the year 2025. A simpler and shorter-term version of the craft, dubbed the Small Launch Vehicle (SLV), is expected by 2010.

Supersonic combustion ramjet technology being developed under the Air Force Research Laboratory's HyTech program will enable missiles to fly at speeds up to Mach 8. Such conceptual missiles like the one pictured could fly hundreds of miles in minutes to defeat time-critical targets.

"Recent military engagement in Bosnia, Afghanistan, and Iraq have underscored both the capabilities and limitations of United States air forces in terms of placing ordinance on military targets," stated a DARPA FALCON draft report on the agency's web site. Despite advancements in target identification and precision, it went on, deficiencies in conducting time-critical missions and defeating high-value or buried targets still remain.

Going hypersonic

Hypersonic aircraft are expected to surpass the abilities of today's supersonic planes by reaching speeds of Mach 7 or more, over seven times the speed of sound. Current efforts, such as NASA's X-43 program, are designed to use a supersonic combustion ramjet -- or scramjet -- to zoom through the air at up to Mach 10, about 7,381 miles (11,880 kilometers) per hour.

FALCON's requirements call for a hypersonic plane with a range of 9,000 nautical miles (16,668 kilometers) and the ability to fly heavy loads of ordinance or other payload to targets from its home airstrip somewhere in the continental United States.

"This system could become the bomber of the future," said DARPA spokeswoman Jan Walker of FALCON in an e-mail interview

According to DARPA's FALCON report, the hypersonic vehicle should be able to take off from any airstrip in the continental U.S. and carry a 12,000-pound (5,443-kilogram) payload of remote controlled missiles called Common Aero Vehicles. These missiles would basically be hypersonic gliders carrying up to 1,000 pounds (453 kilograms) of bombs or other payload to an intended target that could also be launched via the SLVs.

Although DARPA and the Air Force are just beginning the FALCON project, there are other efforts to build such vehicles as a whole or in part. NASA's Next Generation Launch Technology (NGLT) program is working on the National Aerospace Initiative with the Department of Defense to determine the nation's hypersonic aircraft needs.

"I think everything we're doing is important for this country," NGLT program manager Garry Lyles told SPACE.com. Although the aircraft requirements and their intended missions differ between NASA and the defense department, there is still much crosscutting in the technology for both agencies, he added

NASA officials recently determined the cause behind the loss of the X-43A hypersonic test aircraft, which crashed during its maiden flight in 2001. Engineers are now preparing for tests of the X-43C by the end of the decade.

Meanwhile, Florida-based Pratt & Whitney Space Propulsion unveiled its Ground Demonstration Engine, GDE-1, scramjet engine developed for the Air Force Research Laboratory's Hypersonic Technology (HyTech) program. Unveiled at the recent International Air and Space Symposium in Dayton, Ohio, the GDE-1 is light enough to fit on an airplane and has been ground-tested up to Mach 6.5. It weighs less than 150 pounds (68 kilograms) and is a slimmer version of Pratt & Whitney's first scramjet engine, a 2,000 pound copper behemoth that will forever stay grounded.

"I think the next major step is to demonstrate this [GDE-1] engine in flight," said Joaquin Castro, manager of hypersonic programs for Pratt & Whitney. In addition to the development of a GDE-2, Castro hopes to assemble a trio of GDE-1 engines to propel NASA's X-43C hypersonic test vehicle, although a final agreement has yet to be made.

The world within reach

The FALCON program is reminiscent of other unmanned aerial vehicles designed for combat such as Predator and Global Hawk that can also attack or reconnoiter targets by remote control. Global Hawk, for one, is a long-range reconnaissance vehicle capable of flying 36 continuous hours with a range of 13,500 nautical miles (25,002 kilometers). But while those vehicles are designed to strike at military targets without risking the lives of pilots, FALCON vehicles have even speedier goals.

"There's not really a tight connection between FALCON and [unmanned aerial vehicles]," Walker explained. "The driving force behind the FALCON's HCV, SLV and Common Aero Vehicle is to provide capabilities which produce a wide range of effects much more rapidly than today's systems."

Those effects include the ability to strike numerous targets around the globe in just a few hours, or launching short-term satellites to bolster communications, remote sensing or navigation abilities in a target region, she added. Predator and other unmanned aircraft could then use those services during their individual missions.

The FALCON is not the military's first foray into hypersonic, space-based weapons. In the early days of the Cold War the Air Force invested much time and money in developing the Dyna-Soar, a hypersonic aircraft designed to "skip-glide" across the upper atmosphere and deliver conventional or nuclear payloads. Based on research by the Austrian engineer Eugen Sänger, the Dyna-Soar's innovative design -- a fixed wing aircraft, vertical rocket booster launch and conventional runway landing -- helped pave the way for the civilian space shuttle program. The program was cancelled in 1963.

Closer to space

Military applications aside, FALCON's hypersonic cruise vehicle of could lead to an aircraft capable of putting a satellite -- and possibly even humans -- into space. The project's SLV, for example, should be able to loft 2,204-pound (1,000-kilogram) satellites into sun-synchronous orbits, according the FALCON report released by DARPA.

"The technologies implemented by FALCON will lead to capabilities that open the door to a much more robust use of space for the military, civil and commercial sectors," Walker added.

A space shot could be done in stages, allowing a craft to build up enough speed to escape Earth while in flight.

After take-off, a hypersonic craft could use a supersonic turbine engine to reach speeds of Mach 2 or Mach 3, velocities that enable scramjet engines to work by using the plane's speed to compress air for combustion. Once the vehicle reaches its max hypersonic speed, it could then deploy either a separate craft to reach space, as planned for the SLVs, or switch from its air-breathing scramjet engine to some sort of rocket propulsion.

"You can do all this by just staging the vehicle," Lyles said, adding that NASA's X-43C air tests should take flight around 2007. "And I think it's all very exciting."


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: hypersonic; mach10; miltech; nextgeneration; scramjet; space; spaceflight; utah; x43project
The military need control of space, and so need heavy lift to orbit with economy. This program is on the road to accomplishing real space flight. NASA is helping, hopefully usefully.
1 posted on 07/24/2003 1:44:12 AM PDT by Iris7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Iris7
NASA is helping..

Really? That's a switch.

2 posted on 07/24/2003 1:48:36 AM PDT by Ronin (Qui tacet consentit!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Iris7
NASA is helping..

Really? That's a switch.

3 posted on 07/24/2003 1:48:40 AM PDT by Ronin (Qui tacet consentit!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Iris7; KevinDavis; Normal4me; RightWhale; demlosers; Prof Engineer; BlazingArizona; ...
Please put out the Space ping list - you guys are all I have.
4 posted on 07/24/2003 1:49:19 AM PDT by Iris7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ronin
The X-43A,B,and C (flying scramjets) are NASA projects. I hope they can make these important programs successful. The X-43A was destroyed due to too much reliance on simulation programs instead of testing. It came apart in the air. X-43 is unmanned.
5 posted on 07/24/2003 1:54:55 AM PDT by Iris7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Iris7
The technology itself is very impressive, but can some military tech type explain this to me: This is an unmanned hypersonic air craft, so why is this better than MIRVs which (I think) have the same kind of delivery capability? Is it cheaper? It's certainly a more complex system.
6 posted on 07/24/2003 2:29:02 AM PDT by Salman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Salman
The military contract is looking for an unmanned bomber. Over an ICBM, the scramjet won't trip all the WWIII sensors that Russia and the US have and China soon will have in place. I suspect the scramjet is very much cheaper per ton delivered than an ICBM.

The scramjet is planned for conventional munitions, to put them where they are supposed to go, and then fly back to the USA. Round trip maybe 5 1/2 hours. Check maintenance, refuel, rearm, send them off again. Maybe three sorties per day per machine until they need heavy maintenance. A Navy carrier battle group can put up maybe 200 sorties a day at 500 miles range from the carrier. A hundred of these gadgets could make 300 sorties a day, any where in the world, on a two hour notice. and why have only one hundred? Howabout 1,000? 10,000? That's 1,200 sorties per hour, twenty per second, around the clock, day after day.

More importantly this technology can deliver access to space at prices even lower than what the Russians charge. A turbojet first stage, a scramjet second stage, and a rocket third stage, all of which fly home. Or at least the first two do, the third is going to Mars.

7 posted on 07/24/2003 3:21:32 AM PDT by Iris7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: *Space; *miltech
http://www.freerepublic.com/perl/bump-list
8 posted on 07/24/2003 3:25:30 AM PDT by Free the USA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Iris7
Or at least the first two do, the third is going to Mars.

I like the way you think.

9 posted on 07/24/2003 3:42:13 AM PDT by Salman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Salman
Aerospace contractors and NASA and been talking hypersonic flight for decades. That's pretty much all its been, is talk.

I'll only believe it when someone finally produces a SUCCESSFUL test vehicle.

So far, I can't see that anyone is even close.

I don't care what you read in Popular Science.
10 posted on 07/24/2003 4:24:47 AM PDT by Carbonsteel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Carbonsteel
I don't care what you read in Popular Science.

careful now...Bush Rogers of the 24TH century... :)

11 posted on 07/24/2003 4:33:46 AM PDT by skinkinthegrass (Just because you're paranoid,doesn't mean they aren't out to get you. :)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Carbonsteel
Actually a group of Aussies did it last year.
12 posted on 07/24/2003 5:08:00 AM PDT by Dundee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Iris7
Illustrations and photos from the article:


Supersonic combustion ramjet technology being developed under the Air Force Research Laboratory's HyTech program will enable missiles to fly at speeds up to Mach 8. Such conceptual missiles like the one pictured could fly hundreds of miles in minutes to defeat time-critical targets. CREDIT: Mike Bruggeman


A scramjet engine developed by Pratt & Whitney. The company recently unveiled its GDE-1 scramjet, a flight-weight engine that could power long range military aircraft or access-to-space vehicles.


An artist's rendering of the air-breathing, hypersonic X-43C, part of NASA's Hyper-X series of flight demonstrators. CREDIT: Media Fusion, Inc./NASA


Mounted to a NASA B-52, a Pegasus booster is set to launch the X-43A. The June 2, 2001 flight ended in disaster.

13 posted on 07/24/2003 5:11:18 AM PDT by wysiwyg (What parts of "right of the people" and "shall not be infringed" do you not understand?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wysiwyg
Ended in disaster...

What happened to the launch crew?

14 posted on 07/24/2003 5:14:07 AM PDT by Northern Yankee (Freedom.... needs a soldier !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: wysiwyg
...Aurora?..so much for E.T. and U.F.O. :)
15 posted on 07/24/2003 5:20:53 AM PDT by skinkinthegrass (Just because you're paranoid,doesn't mean they aren't out to get you. :)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Northern Yankee
From: EXCLUSIVE: Cause of X-43A Hyper-X Crash Identified
On June 2, 2001, the X-43A "stack" -- a modified Orbital Sciences Corporation’s Pegasus XL booster topped with the Hyper-X research vehicle -- was released from a B-52 carrier aircraft. Booster ignition went as planned, with the aircraft accelerating on its predetermined high-altitude ascent. Seconds later, however, booster fins broke off and the aircraft spun out of control. The vehicle was then destroyed by range control.
What happened to the launch crew?

Apparently, nothing.

16 posted on 07/24/2003 5:27:32 AM PDT by wysiwyg (What parts of "right of the people" and "shall not be infringed" do you not understand?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: wysiwyg
Thanks for the info.

Eagles up!

17 posted on 07/24/2003 7:21:07 AM PDT by Northern Yankee (Freedom.... needs a soldier !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: JRandomFreeper; Rivendell; ALOHA RONNIE; Kathy in Alaska; AntiJen; Aeronaut
Ping...

Interesting idea...

I reckon they won't need a test pilot for this.

18 posted on 07/24/2003 7:23:54 AM PDT by Northern Yankee (Freedom.... needs a soldier !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Salman
why is this better than MIRVs

It's under control all the way and can be called back or diverted at any time. You can call off an attack after it is begun: cease fire. Sometimes you want to do that. Ballistic missiles could all be launched at the touch of a single button and then they are gone, the deed is done, no second thoughts.

19 posted on 07/24/2003 10:33:02 AM PDT by RightWhale (Destroy the dark; restore the light)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson