Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Mr. K
Hardly looks like a liberal outfit:

http://www.national-security.org/issues.shtml


but then you asserted a liberal cause for intervention ("the killing and torturing of his own people") in your post so I take it you were either being ironic or being absurd.
7 posted on 07/23/2003 8:13:12 AM PDT by JohnGalt (They're All Lying)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: JohnGalt; Mr. K
Hardly looks like a liberal outfit:

True..."liberal" is not exactly the word I'd use, and in fact their website has all the best "conservative links", but... their "about us" page is blank, and they've not (yet?) put any bio's for their "policy analysts", none of which I've heard of! I'd say more of an "old generals" alert (you know what I'm talking about...we've seen them on TV) and I can't say as I agree with them myself; what do you make of this from their home page?!

"CNSI supports the implementation of the tenets of the Weinburger Doctrine, which states that the US should only fight wars that are just and that further the US vital interest only after all reasonable alternatives have first been exhausted and with total national commitment including the support of a sizable majority of the US population.

So far, so good, but read on:

CNSI adds its voice to those of retired Generals Schwartzkopf, Zinni, Hoar, Clark, Scowcroft, Shalikashvili and many members of former President George H.W. Bush’s Gulf War cabinet including former Secretary of States Jim Baker and Lawrence Eagleburger, former HUD Secretary Jack Kemp and until recently, former Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff General Colin Powell in urging the Administration to abandon its plans for an unnecessary and unprovoked invasion of Iraq fraught with potential negative consequences for US national security.

CNSI believes that the expert opinions of retired and still serving general officers on this and other important issues have been given insufficient consideration by the President and his Secretary of Defense.

'Course, they're also anti-UN, pro big tanks and heavy weapons, and opposed to "nuking" anyone (they actually used the word "nuking", in quotes...that's kind of unprofessional, don't you think?!)...but I think as sensible as they may seem on some issues, they just really dislike Rummy a lot, and do not want a "lighter, faster" military, LOL!!!

25 posted on 07/23/2003 9:17:10 AM PDT by 88keys
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson