Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 07/23/2003 8:02:37 AM PDT by Enemy Of The State
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last
To: Enemy Of The State
We had such weak arguments... the killing and torturing of his own people, and sponsoring terrorism was NOT enough to kill that b@stard...

Geez liberals are pathetic...
2 posted on 07/23/2003 8:05:24 AM PDT by Mr. K (VEY series about everything)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Enemy Of The State
Why Did the Bush Administration Really Decide to Invade Iraq?

Because it would cause the Democrats to make a$$es out of themselves!

3 posted on 07/23/2003 8:06:28 AM PDT by Onelifetogive
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Enemy Of The State
Reason #1: The U.N.'s incapability to enforce it's own resolutions since Bush 41.
5 posted on 07/23/2003 8:09:51 AM PDT by RasterMaster (Saddam's family was a WMD)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Enemy Of The State
To make a example of an established ME state as to what will happen if they continue to pursue WMD and state terrorism.

Worked, too.
8 posted on 07/23/2003 8:13:15 AM PDT by Little Ray (When in trouble, when in doubt, run in circles, scream and shout!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Enemy Of The State
The justification is 9/11/2001. Personally I would not have "done" Iraq first. Clearly, Iran, Syria, Saudi Arabia, Pakistan, and N. Korea should have been "done" first.

What Iraq shows is the folly of 'boots on the ground'. There really is a potential quagmire.

So nuke 'em, Dano, and move on to the next target.

--Boris

9 posted on 07/23/2003 8:13:20 AM PDT by boris (The deadliest Weapon of Mass Destruction in History is a Leftist With a Word Processor)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Enemy Of The State
I don't know, why did Clinton bomb Sudan?
10 posted on 07/23/2003 8:14:00 AM PDT by Semper Paratus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Enemy Of The State
The US (and if you care about them, the UN) told Iraq in no uncertain terms: disarm, or prove that you have, or we're coming in.

They didn't, so we did.

End of story.

Why is that so hard to understand?
13 posted on 07/23/2003 8:17:32 AM PDT by IncPen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Enemy Of The State
I thought the invasion was all about yellowcake. Not that that's fallen through, I feel very misled. /sarcasm
14 posted on 07/23/2003 8:17:53 AM PDT by kevao
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Enemy Of The State
We invaded Iraq so Disneyland Middle-east could be built, complete with the Terrorist Bomber roller coaster attraction, to recruit cute Iraqi babes for colleges here and get them on the cheer leading team and to assure that we have enough sand to pack up the butts of French surrender monkeys.

Twits.
17 posted on 07/23/2003 8:24:30 AM PDT by sergeantdave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Enemy Of The State
This article sounds like good reasons to me.
18 posted on 07/23/2003 8:29:50 AM PDT by VRWC_minion (Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and most are right)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Enemy Of The State
The sky is falling --- The sky is falling!!!

Guys like this just won't take success for an answer.

22 posted on 07/23/2003 8:49:08 AM PDT by beckett
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Enemy Of The State
bump
24 posted on 07/23/2003 9:12:58 AM PDT by kimosabe31
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Enemy Of The State
Sorry, dude. "Real" conservatives DID support this. The fact is these states were, and many remain, threats to this country through their support of terrorism, with or without WMDs. (They have them, don't worry).

Real conservatives don't hide behind the "isolationist" blatherings of Buchanan, but understand that an active foreign policy of taking out your enemies is preferable to 9/11.

26 posted on 07/23/2003 9:27:41 AM PDT by LS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Enemy Of The State
First and foremost was the President's desire to avenge his father's failure to achieve a lasting victory over Saddam and more particularly his desire to get back at Saddam for an alleged assassination attempt against former President Bush Sr. in 1993.

That's pretty much the case.   A tie to 9/11 was conjured  up to paper this over.

31 posted on 07/23/2003 10:35:23 AM PDT by gcruse (http://gcruse.blogspot.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Enemy Of The State
Look at it as a strategic military and geo-political decision. By taking Iraq you cut the Mulim crescent from N. Africa to S.E. Asia in two.

Co-incidentally, you demonstrate your military capability in the Arab world by conclusively beating the largest Muslim military regime twice in ten years with hardly any losses.
33 posted on 07/23/2003 10:52:28 AM PDT by wildbill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Enemy Of The State
This is a pathetic load of lies. Long but still crap. Bush did not invade Iraq for ANY personal reasons. The article's statement to that effect is only one of the lies it attempts to spread.

Another howler "Iran is a democracy." Please, no more, I am laughing too hard.
34 posted on 07/23/2003 10:57:06 AM PDT by justshutupandtakeit (RATS will use any means to denigrate George Bush's Victory.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Enemy Of The State
Just another ahistorical rant forgetting that we, and the UK, have been bombing Saddam since 1991, and that we were engaged there.
36 posted on 07/23/2003 11:00:11 AM PDT by Shermy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Enemy Of The State
I only got this far:

First and foremost was the President's desire to avenge his father's failure ...

Any serious discussion of our motivations for going into Iraq that begins with the ridiculous assertion that this was the PRIMARY reason for invading is a harbinger of bias. Or perhaps just the workings of a politically adolescent mind. Powerful men such as Bush II seldom have that kind of love of their fathers. Bush II is concerned with his own successes/failures, not those of his father. Only a teen-ager would believe such moronic assertions.

39 posted on 07/23/2003 11:16:46 AM PDT by Catalonia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Enemy Of The State
"In fact, Iran is a democracy today"

In fact, with this sentence, this article destroyed any chance of me reading further. Anyone who claims as "fact" that the Iranian Thugocracy is a democracy doesn't deserve your time.

40 posted on 07/23/2003 11:18:59 AM PDT by Frances_Marion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Enemy Of The State
Public Law No: 107-243
41 posted on 07/23/2003 11:21:28 AM PDT by michigander
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson