Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Rome2000
From post #45:

The first reported case involving the review of a sneak and peek warrant was United States v. Freitas.6 In Freitas, DEA agents obtained eight warrants to search numerous sites used in a large-scale methamphetamine operation. Before those warrants were executed, agents applied for and obtained a sneak and peek warrant for one of those locations to "determine the status of the suspected clandestine methamphetamine laboratory."7

Yep, they're only using this provision to fight terrorism...

47 posted on 07/23/2003 9:49:14 AM PDT by dirtboy (Not enough words in FR taglines to adequately describe the dimensions of Hillary's thunderous thighs)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies ]


To: dirtboy
Yep, they're only using this provision to fight terrorism...

Hey! Don't you know that drugs fund terrorism? < /sarcasm>

48 posted on 07/23/2003 10:48:10 AM PDT by jmc813 (Check out the FR Big Brother 4 thread! http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/943368/posts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson