Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: steveegg
what the Patriot Act did was not cut out the judge, but cut out the notification given at the start of a search

Right, but the Feds don't have to go to a judge once the initial approval is given.

If the FBI wants to investigate a suspected terrroist cell at a mosque,they can do it without having to get individual warrants every time the guy buys a new throwaway cellphone.

20 posted on 07/22/2003 10:33:59 PM PDT by Rome2000 (Convicted felons for Kerry)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]


To: Rome2000
Without the text of that amendment, I can't say for certain whether the amendment covers simply what the article claims it covers (the lack of notification) or also the "don't have to get individual warrants each time a subject of a warrant buys a new cell phone part". If it's merely the former, then it is a good thing. If it also covers the latter, that's troublesome.
23 posted on 07/22/2003 10:38:31 PM PDT by steveegg (Uday and Qusay are now reunited with their daddy; confirmation that Saddam is also there pending)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

To: Rome2000
"If the FBI wants to investigate a suspected terrroist cell at a mosque,they can do it without having to get individual warrants every time the guy buys a new throwaway cellphone."

So if instead of enacting a police-state law that applies to all Americans (consider the braod definition of terrorism), why not a law relating to different disposable cell phones owned by the same suspect?

PS Where can I buy some disposable cell phones?


29 posted on 07/23/2003 6:35:41 AM PDT by Atlas Sneezed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson