To: steveegg
what the Patriot Act did was not cut out the judge, but cut out the notification given at the start of a searchRight, but the Feds don't have to go to a judge once the initial approval is given.
If the FBI wants to investigate a suspected terrroist cell at a mosque,they can do it without having to get individual warrants every time the guy buys a new throwaway cellphone.
20 posted on
07/22/2003 10:33:59 PM PDT by
Rome2000
(Convicted felons for Kerry)
To: Rome2000
Without the text of that amendment, I can't say for certain whether the amendment covers simply what the article claims it covers (the lack of notification) or also the "don't have to get individual warrants each time a subject of a warrant buys a new cell phone part". If it's merely the former, then it is a good thing. If it also covers the latter, that's troublesome.
23 posted on
07/22/2003 10:38:31 PM PDT by
steveegg
(Uday and Qusay are now reunited with their daddy; confirmation that Saddam is also there pending)
To: Rome2000
"If the FBI wants to investigate a suspected terrroist cell at a mosque,they can do it without having to get individual warrants every time the guy buys a new throwaway cellphone."
So if instead of enacting a police-state law that applies to all Americans (consider the braod definition of terrorism), why not a law relating to different disposable cell phones owned by the same suspect?
PS Where can I buy some disposable cell phones?
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson