Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: cyncooper
I think that if a woman agreed to have vaginal intercourse with a man and that man forced her to have anal intercourse, that is rape. As a juror, I would have no problem convicting on those facts. Consent for some things is not consent for everything.
507 posted on 07/22/2003 6:59:14 PM PDT by Iwo Jima
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 501 | View Replies ]


To: Iwo Jima
Boy, you're really splitting hairs, aren't you?
513 posted on 07/22/2003 7:21:16 PM PDT by Pharmboy (Dems lie 'cause they have to...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 507 | View Replies ]

To: Iwo Jima
I think that if a woman agreed to have vaginal intercourse with a man and that man forced her to have anal intercourse, that is rape. As a juror, I would have no problem convicting on those facts. Consent for some things is not consent for everything

That is a tough call. But in the end, I think I would disagree. It is wrong and degrading but I don't know if I would go as far as saying it is rape. I certainly couldn't see putting someone in jail for it.

522 posted on 07/22/2003 7:46:49 PM PDT by riri
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 507 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson