To: cyncooper
I think that if a woman agreed to have vaginal intercourse with a man and that man forced her to have anal intercourse, that is rape. As a juror, I would have no problem convicting on those facts. Consent for some things is not consent for everything.
To: Iwo Jima
Boy, you're really splitting hairs, aren't you?
513 posted on
07/22/2003 7:21:16 PM PDT by
Pharmboy
(Dems lie 'cause they have to...)
To: Iwo Jima
I think that if a woman agreed to have vaginal intercourse with a man and that man forced her to have anal intercourse, that is rape. As a juror, I would have no problem convicting on those facts. Consent for some things is not consent for everything That is a tough call. But in the end, I think I would disagree. It is wrong and degrading but I don't know if I would go as far as saying it is rape. I certainly couldn't see putting someone in jail for it.
522 posted on
07/22/2003 7:46:49 PM PDT by
riri
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson