Well, I suppose that is one of the prices to pay for CHOSING to remain anonymous even after you have accused a person of a crime that could carry a life sentence. These stories about her could still be refuted... since colorado girl has no trouble leaking out through her accomplices.. I mean friends... that she was 'disgusted' by the Kobe press conference. Since there is a plethora of townspeople coming forward with stories about this girl... I dont see why there aren't plenty available to debunk or refute these stories. The "friend" who went to the OC register about the OD had no trouble trying to spin her original story by saying she was quoted out-of-context, after getting in trouble with her friend no doubt
Anyone can tell any lie they want about her because there's no one to refute it, she's not famous and therefore not watched all the time
Uhhh... no actually she's chosen to be anonymous.. hence she isn't available for refuting... Non-famous people are still afforded the same rights of slander and libel.
She's not anonymous, everyone in the media knows who she is. But she's not followed like a famous person like Bryant is so it's easy to lie about a non-famous person.
These stories about her could still be refuted... since colorado girl has no trouble leaking out through her accomplices.. I mean friends... that she was 'disgusted' by the Kobe press conference.
How do you know that was true?
Since there is a plethora of townspeople coming forward with stories about this girl... I dont see why there aren't plenty available to debunk or refute these stories.
Because she's not surrounded 24/7 like Bryant is. If someone said something about a person here in my town, I couldn't refute it because the odds are low that I would know exactly what someone else here in town does all the time.
The "friend" who went to the OC register about the OD had no trouble trying to spin her original story by saying she was quoted out-of-context, after getting in trouble with her friend no doubt
How do you know? It's amazing how you know exactly everything that's going on behind the scenes with everything.
Uhhh... no actually she's chosen to be anonymous.. hence she isn't available for refuting... Non-famous people are still afforded the same rights of slander and libel.
Like I said she's not anonymous. She's just not surrounded all the time like a person like Bryant.