Not particularly. You had your chance to oppose the intervention during the months in which it was debated ad nauseam.
Express your opinion all you want, but I will not join your pretense that you are expressing it in a vacuum.
why they continue to wholeheartedly support a failing immigration system
Not a very deft change of subject.
before he goes on espousing Genghis Kahn dogma as official foreign policy.
The hyperbole in this comment is too ridiculous to address, and the leap in logic is dizzying. Pipes has been quite open in his denunciation of our cozy relationship with the Saudis.
Pipes was also denouncing the flow of Saudi Wahhabist money and personnel into this country before 9/11.
Could it be that perhaps Pipes disagrees with certain individuals' stance on immigration while agreeing with their stance on foreign policy? Probably not reductive enough for you.
BTW, why the constant use of "Mssr."? Is this ignorance or affectation on your part?