Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Consort
When one adds up all the "kills" the Germans claim, not just the ones listed, the total exceeds the number of the loss totals for all allied aircraft. I think the Krauts were counting their ammunition as "kills". In the end, it doesn't matter anyway. The German's lost.
43 posted on 07/21/2003 9:18:01 PM PDT by elbucko
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]


To: elbucko
When one adds up all the "kills" the Germans claim, not just the ones listed, the total exceeds the number of the loss totals for all allied aircraft. I think the Krauts were counting their ammunition as "kills".

After the war, the Allied powers were very skeptical of the Luftwaffe's kill claims, until they saw their meticulous documentation and research. The RLM in Berlin were incredibly exacting in their records, as were their standards. Both the US and the British launched investigations into the Luftwaffe, not so much as out of a desire to prove or disprove the Luftwaffe aces claims, but to figure out how the Luftwaffe, outnumbered and outgunned still proved to be one of the most lethal and most highly organized fighting machines in history.

Both the Allied and the Axis pilots required either a witness and/or gun camera footage to claim a kill. Some of the more prolific aces (Hartman, Galland, Priller) had designated wingmen whose primary job it was to tally their leaders kills.

Moreover, the Luftwaffe initiated a stringent "point" system for their pilots. While the allies branded a pilot an "ace" after 5 kills, the Luftwaffe required many more times this number before the full "Experten" lable would be awarded. Please see LUFTWAFFE SCORE SYSTEM

The book The Luftwaffe Diaries was completed in the 1960's, and documented that the Luftwaffe was not only accurate in its claims of kills by its aces, it undercounted many claims. Moreover, the RLM in Berlin was more stringent in its criteria than either London or Washington.

In short---those Luftwaffe aces were not some figment of the Nazi propaganda machine. They were the real.

127 posted on 07/22/2003 12:50:36 AM PDT by SkyPilot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies ]

To: elbucko
When one adds up all the "kills" the Germans claim

I think what they did was share kills. If two ganged up on a bomber, they would both get credit for the kill. So I was told, anyway.

135 posted on 07/22/2003 3:07:33 PM PDT by RightWhale (Destroy the dark; restore the light)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies ]

To: elbucko
Erich Hartmann's mark of 352 kills is generally accepted as valid. Most of his kills were in the east although he did get a few P51s. He mostly few ME109s, but did fly some in ME262s late in the war. He was just a kid when he started and was the one big ace who came back after years in Soviet POW camps to fly in the new Luftwaffe. Retired as a General flying F104s as I recall. Hartmann had "The Right Stuff." His biography, The Blond Knight of Germany, is excellent and covers his WWII career, his years as a Soviet prisoner and his later career in the modern air force.

It's hard to know how to compare kills in different theaters, but don't underrate the Germans. One of their aces shot down about 150 Brits, mainly in N. Africa, before being killed. That's a lot more than the top Allied ace (a Russian) shot down.

149 posted on 08/03/2003 2:29:30 PM PDT by JohnBovenmyer (I)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson