Replies

You honestly believe that Saddam suddenly went against his normal behavior and behaved himself for once? Since you want to defend the Ragi so badly, SHOW YOUR PROOF OF HIS COMLPIANCE.

Listen very carefully. I don't care if he complied or not, I don't care what happened to him. He's dead (most probably) and that's a good thing. However I don't like the main reason of the war to be such a straw man that has no proof other than the words of the politicians that called for same said war. As I've said a bag of beans and a centrifuge do not a WMD make

Secondly, I don't see that Saddam Hussein was any more a direct and immediate threat than the terrorist supporters in Saudi Arabia. And we call them allies. Talk about a laugh

BZZZZT wrong!
That was not the MAIN reason, but A reason.
And yes, there are still chem weapons in Iraq.
ALOT of sand to look through there, and Iraq has a history of burying things to hide them.
And I don't know anyone who wants to fly corn rows with ground penetrating radar looking for things that'll be fuzzy circles or itty bitty rows on the screen.
So it's more a case of finding paperwork and getting it translated, or someone being brave enough to come forward and speak.
Liek that guy that tried to hand Hans Blix a black binder full of information and instead of getting asylum, Blix handed him back.
That guy is now nowhere ot be found, his binder was handed back to the IIS thugs and the guy is prolly dead right now.

Your denial of Iraq's behavior is a masterstroke of intellectual Sominex.
You have so far shown inability to think through the simplest of KNOWN behaviors that Iraq has shown.
And for that, I am amused.

"However I don't like the main reason of the war to be such a straw man that has no proof other than the words of the politicians that called for same said war."

Tell me, when did we go to war for reasons other than something said by politicians (putting evidence aside for a moment - of which there was plenty).