Replies

The original question that YOU missed as well, Mein Freund.
Maybe if you spent less time whining about how Sadman got spanked, you'd have more time to pay attention.
Reading is fundamental.
I also see that you have no clever response to the FACT that there are UNACCOUNTED FOR chemical weapons that SHOULD have been easily verified as to whether or not they were destroyed.
Instead, they are just missing.
Vanished, Alakapoof.
Presto change-o.

And OF COURSE CLINTON LIED!
BOTH OF THEM.

A lot has been said about Bush 'LYING' to get us into this war. Did Clinton ever lie to get us in a war?

Up at the very top of this page. By its wording, the question insinuates itself that it's a given that Bush may have stretched the truth to start the war

Reading is fundamental

You're telling me?

I also see that you have no clever response to the FACT that there are UNACCOUNTED FOR chemical weapons that SHOULD have been easily verified as to whether or not they were destroyed. Instead, they are just missing

Hell's bells then son. We need to ransack through the entire Middle East looking for these weapons. Up next? Syria and Iran, although I'm sure Jordan could probably get on the bad side sooner or later. Just stay away from our ally in Saudi Arabia, eh?