Replies

"I wonder why he allowed so many false and misleading statements prior to the new doctrine of pre-emption"

That is what I, too, was addressing. Your premise that there were many false and misleading statements, I don't agree with. What were the many false and misleading statements?

Do you really think that hBush would make all this up or intentionally mislead when everyone knows how the media is as well as the democrats reaction? Do you really think that he would put his presidency on the line and just parrot what was told him?

Why the 10+ years of UN sanctions, Clinton bombings,no fly zones, etc. if there were no weapons of mass destruction? What was the UN reacting to??

Bush is not evil nor is he dumb.Saddam is evil and dumb. He had only to show what he did with the WMD that the UN said he had. He left behind all those mass graves as his legacy. Saddam was a sponsor of terrorism. He paid the homicide bombers $25000 for each event. The Alqaeda member (forget his name) was in Bagdad getting medical care, what do you think he did with all those missing vials of nerve gas? Was the UN all wrong? There was unanimous vote against Iraq. The UN did not have the balls to put teeth in its message and take aggressive military action.

The US still can't find the anthrax killer here in the USA. Does that mean that he did not exist? No,we just have not been able to find.

If you look at all the paperwork--the multiple agencies reporting to Bush re: intelligence said the nuclear threat was real--our CIA was not sure--but all the other agencies were. Now they are all wrong and so is the British government according to you.