Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 07/21/2003 5:32:03 PM PDT by webber
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: webber
After they get some definition on this issue, maybe they'll work on defining private property rights.
2 posted on 07/21/2003 5:34:40 PM PDT by RightWhale (Destroy the dark; restore the light)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: *Privacy_list
http://www.freerepublic.com/perl/bump-list
4 posted on 07/21/2003 6:04:13 PM PDT by Libertarianize the GOP (Ideas have consequences)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: webber
Sounds like just another bag of political hot air designed to support election claims. Requiring review and consideration is totally meaningless with neither specific restrictions on privacy violating actions nor with some clear delineation of what our "privacy rights" are and under what circumstances they can be violated.

True leadership would be a codification of our rights and protection thereof. The rest is all just paper shuffling politics. Privacy is a matter of Liberty in my view. I'm not up on all the law but it seems the framers left us very exposed on this one because there was no way for them to envision the magnitude of todays privacy issues.
5 posted on 07/22/2003 7:24:37 PM PDT by cdrw (Freedom and responsibility are inseparable)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson