Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Hodar
After bankrupting several companies, the new studies showed that the number of women who had acquired immuniodeficiences after the implants, was practically identical to the number of women in the control group.

Right, but it is difficult to convince the hysterics with objective data. Maybe impossible.

One danger of silicone implants is that it makes mammograms more difficult for the radiologist to read and find early breast cancer, but that is not an adverse effect of the silicone.

35 posted on 07/21/2003 2:22:25 PM PDT by RJCogburn ("You think one on four's a dogfall?".....Lucky Ned Pepper)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]


To: RJCogburn
One danger of silicone implants is that it makes mammograms more difficult for the radiologist to read and find early breast cancer, but that is not an adverse effect of the silicone.

Very true. One way the plastic surgeon would handle breast hardening was to squeeze the breast to try and "pop" the scare tissue that begins to grow immediately around the breast. In some cases only part of the breast scar tissue would "pop" and the breast would appear oblong and bruise quickly. Very painful for the patient and very stupid.

But scar tissue is the main enemy of implants. It can tighten up the implant to the point of rupture. I've seen it happen.

49 posted on 07/21/2003 2:38:37 PM PDT by bedolido (Ann Coulter... A Conservative Male's Natural Viagra)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson